Difference between revisions of "Thread:Talk:RoboRumble/RoboRumble ranking unstable/reply"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m (Reply to RoboRumble ranking unstable) |
(No difference)
|
Latest revision as of 14:32, 13 July 2019
That may be caused by a design flaw of the rumble client, which I didn't verify though. If the rumble cannot read robowiki's participants list, it will load a local cache instead. However, if that cache is outdated, it may cause the rumble to loose pairings, and recovering takes much longer. But this seems not to be the case losing 40 pairings.
Another possibility may be that the rumble client got a truncated participant list due to network issues, for this case, I may modify the client to check some flag to make sure the loaded participants list is full.