Difference between revisions of "Talk:Darkcanuck/RRServer"

From Robowiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m (migrated from old wiki)
 
m (added new comment from old wiki)
Line 4: Line 4:
  
 
* Thanks!  That's a good check, will be combining that with the survival >=35 (also your suggestion I think) once I rearrange the error handling and failure output to the client.  Then I'll look into ELO... --[[Darkcanuck]]
 
* Thanks!  That's a good check, will be combining that with the survival >=35 (also your suggestion I think) once I rearrange the error handling and failure output to the client.  Then I'll look into ELO... --[[Darkcanuck]]
 +
* Your checks have both been implemented.  -- [[Darkcanuck]]

Revision as of 22:55, 25 September 2008

Fire away...

Just a suggestion for an additional check. I have never seen score a bot more than 8000 points, so this could be checked too. When examining the results that messed up the original roborumble rating beyond repair, I saw results of 20000 against 16000 (Thats what you get when running OneOnOne with MELEE=YES). For the time being I let my client running (unattended) for ABC's server, as I don't really have the time for bughunting. Your effort however seems promising. Good luck. -- GrubbmGait

  • Thanks! That's a good check, will be combining that with the survival >=35 (also your suggestion I think) once I rearrange the error handling and failure output to the client. Then I'll look into ELO... --Darkcanuck
  • Your checks have both been implemented. -- Darkcanuck