Difference between revisions of "Talk:GravityWave"

From Robowiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(thanks - info about the DB versions.)
m (added sig)
Line 5: Line 5:
  
 
By the way, I highly suggest you try and test against a head-on targeter like HawkOnFire. If you're unable to dodge literally 99.8% of the bullets, then your surfing has a bug probably :) --[[User:Rednaxela|Rednaxela]] 19:16, 7 June 2009 (UTC)
 
By the way, I highly suggest you try and test against a head-on targeter like HawkOnFire. If you're unable to dodge literally 99.8% of the bullets, then your surfing has a bug probably :) --[[User:Rednaxela|Rednaxela]] 19:16, 7 June 2009 (UTC)
: DB 3.5 is a head on shooter.  3.8 is a reduced linear aim per range bot that is pretty much head on outside of 600 or so.  So both show a very, very strong gun :)
+
: DB 3.5 is a head on shooter.  3.8 is a reduced linear aim per range bot that is pretty much head on outside of 600 or so.  So both show a very, very strong gun :) --[[User:Miked0801|Miked0801]] 19:55, 7 June 2009 (UTC)

Revision as of 21:55, 7 June 2009

How does it do against DustBunny 3.7 or 3.8? Both of those have signifigantly improved aim and perhaps a bit better movement? --Miked0801 13:43, 7 June 2009 (UTC)

Haven't tested it yet. I'll get it and do a 500 test and post the results. Hopefully the smarter field buffer will help. :) --Jacob Litewski 16:55, 7 June 2009 (UTC)

Newest test against DustBunny 3.8 is up. --18:15, 7 June 2009 (UTC)

By the way, I highly suggest you try and test against a head-on targeter like HawkOnFire. If you're unable to dodge literally 99.8% of the bullets, then your surfing has a bug probably :) --Rednaxela 19:16, 7 June 2009 (UTC)

DB 3.5 is a head on shooter. 3.8 is a reduced linear aim per range bot that is pretty much head on outside of 600 or so. So both show a very, very strong gun :) --Miked0801 19:55, 7 June 2009 (UTC)