Difference between revisions of "Talk:GuinnessCS"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(First serious C# bot?) |
(comment) |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
Interesting to see what appears to be the first serious C# bot. One quick note is, don't expect C# bots to be able to run in rumble any time soon probably. Still interesting though :) --[[User:Rednaxela|Rednaxela]] 15:01, 15 March 2010 (UTC) | Interesting to see what appears to be the first serious C# bot. One quick note is, don't expect C# bots to be able to run in rumble any time soon probably. Still interesting though :) --[[User:Rednaxela|Rednaxela]] 15:01, 15 March 2010 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | Yeah, cool. =) I'm also skeptical we'll ever open the rumble to them. So many of us run Mac or Linux... That would mean a lack of RoboRumble power for .NET bots, plus we would be unable to test against those bots, which is pretty unfair. But if enough people start writing .NET bots, obviously we could pursue some kind of solution. --[[User:Voidious|Voidious]] 15:31, 15 March 2010 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 17:31, 15 March 2010
First serious C# bot?
Interesting to see what appears to be the first serious C# bot. One quick note is, don't expect C# bots to be able to run in rumble any time soon probably. Still interesting though :) --Rednaxela 15:01, 15 March 2010 (UTC)
Yeah, cool. =) I'm also skeptical we'll ever open the rumble to them. So many of us run Mac or Linux... That would mean a lack of RoboRumble power for .NET bots, plus we would be unable to test against those bots, which is pretty unfair. But if enough people start writing .NET bots, obviously we could pursue some kind of solution. --Voidious 15:31, 15 March 2010 (UTC)
