Difference between revisions of "Talk:WhiteWhale (robot)"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Created page with 'This is not a new idea, however it was generally agreed that this was a direction in development that shouldn't be pursued as it's tantamount to cheating. Respectfully, I'd very …') |
m |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | This is not a new idea, however it was generally agreed that this was a direction in development that shouldn't be pursued as it's tantamount to cheating. Respectfully, I'd very much like to see this bot banned from the rumble. -- [[User:Kuuran|Kuuran]] 02:12, 3 October 2009 (UTC) | + | This is not a new idea, however it was generally agreed that this was a direction in development that shouldn't be pursued as it's tantamount to cheating. It's very cool that you got it working in practice and I'm all for trying new experiments on stuff like this, but weight classes in competition exist for a reason, and hiding the bytecode somewhere where codesize won't find it doesn't actually change the fact that you're using more code than the weight class allows for. Respectfully, I'd very much like to see this bot banned from the rumble. -- [[User:Kuuran|Kuuran]] 02:12, 3 October 2009 (UTC) |
Revision as of 04:18, 3 October 2009
This is not a new idea, however it was generally agreed that this was a direction in development that shouldn't be pursued as it's tantamount to cheating. It's very cool that you got it working in practice and I'm all for trying new experiments on stuff like this, but weight classes in competition exist for a reason, and hiding the bytecode somewhere where codesize won't find it doesn't actually change the fact that you're using more code than the weight class allows for. Respectfully, I'd very much like to see this bot banned from the rumble. -- Kuuran 02:12, 3 October 2009 (UTC)
