Targeting

From RoboWiki
Revision as of 23:16, 27 August 2017 by MultiplyByZer0 (Talk | contribs)

(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to: navigation, search
Youtube
Youtube has a video of Targeting in action: click here to watch

In Robocode, your goal is to deplete your opponent's energy, increase your own energy, and collect points by hitting other bots with bullets. For info about bullet damage and scoring, see Robocode/Game Physics and Robocode/Scoring.

The main components of a targeting system are:

  • Choosing a target (Melee only) ‒ Find the right balance of conserving energy, collecting bullet damage points, picking off easy targets, and killing bots that are dangerous to you.
  • Energy Management ‒ Choosing the right bullet power, or whether to fire or conserve your energy.
  • Choosing a firing angle ‒ The crux of Robocode targeting.

Targeting as a classification problem

Most descriptions of Robocode targeting systems focus on choosing a firing angle. This is essentially a classification problem. The enemy robot can't react to where you fire your bullets because he can't see your gun or your bullets (until/unless they hit him or one of his bullets). He can, however, see when you fire by monitoring your energy.

Some aspects that make Robocode targeting an interesting classification problem are:

  • You have a very small amount of time per tick to make a decision. Dropping in the most sophisticated classification algorithm you can find in a textbook won't work. The time you have needs to be split between collecting data and generating firing angles.
  • You have to continually make decisions with a changing data set. When you have no data, when you have 50 ticks, 500 ticks, or 20,000 ticks of data, your algorithm has to perform well and remain fast.
  • Improving a classification algorithm is hard. Some of the biggest advancements come from insights into collecting data accurately and how inputs and outputs are represented, like GuessFactors, innovative wall distance measurements, precise max escape angles, precise wave intersection, and choosing the right gun.

Common gun configurations

Some of the most common learning gun configurations are (in order of effectiveness and complexity):

  • Head-On Targeting ‒ Shoot at where you last saw your enemy. Useless against anything that moves in a single direction most of the time. It, however, works surprisingly well against Oscillator Movement and sometimes random movement.
  • Circular Targeting ‒ Assume the enemy will continue moving and turning with the same velocity/turnrate that he is right now, and shoot there.
  • Pattern Matching with Play It Forward ‒ Use the enemy's recent movements as the input, find a time in the past when his relative movements were similar, and guess that he will continue in the same fashion as he did in the most similar previous situation.
  • Traditional GuessFactor Targeting (Segmentated Visit Count Stats with GuessFactors) ‒ Choose a few attributes to describe firing situations, segment them into a multi-dimensional array that covers all possible situation, and tally the hitting GuessFactor in each situation encountered (like a multivariate histogram). At fire time, fire at the most often visited GuessFactor for the segment describing the current situation.
  • Dynamic Clustering with GuessFactors ‒ Choose a few attributes to describe firing situations, log the attributes and hitting GuessFactor for every situation encountered. At fire time, choose some number (k) of similar situations from your log, and find the densest area of the graph of the corresponding GuessFactors.

FAQ

What's the difference between GuessFactors and Play It Forward?
GF targeting means choosing a (normalized) angle, and shooting at it. PIF targeting means picking a point, and shooting at it.


v  d  e 

Targeting

Quick
Statistical
Log-Based
Heuristics
Hybrid
Firing Angle
Energy
Terms
Related
See Also: Category:Targeting
Personal tools