Thread history

From RoboWiki
From Talk:Darkcanuck/RRServer/Ratings
Viewing a history listing
Jump to: navigation, search
Time User descActivity Comment
19:00, 7 October 2011Voidious (Talk | contribs)New reply created (Reply to Mad idea about rankings)
11:50, 7 October 2011Jdev (Talk | contribs)Comment text edited (calculations fix)
11:42, 7 October 2011Jdev (Talk | contribs)New thread created 

Just mad idea about rankings. What if robot's rating is: <percents from 1st place's APS in 1-vs-1> + <percents from 1st place's APS in melee> * 0.6 + <percents from 1st place's APS in temas> * 0.3?

For example for DrussGT it will be 100 + 0 * 0.6 + 0 * 0.3 = 100, for Diamond 99.23 + 99.8 * 0.6 + 0 * 0.3 = 158,88, for Shadow 94.43 + 98.68 * 0.6 + 100 * 0.3 = 183,64

It allow develop melee and teams rumbles

Jdev11:42, 7 October 2011

I think that's kind of looking at it backwards. I don't think the combined ranking would make people more interested in Melee/Teams, but I do think if more people were building cross-divisional bots, such a ranking would be more interesting. =)

I don't think it's the lack of rankings that make people uninterested in Melee/Teams, I think people just like 1v1. And in that case, people will just focus on 1v1 rankings, even if combined rankings are available. I think the best thing you can do to get people interested in Melee/Teams is to work on them yourself!

I also think about other rule sets occasionally. Sometimes I think about building a MegaBot Twin Duel team, even if it couldn't compete in the rumble.

Voidious19:00, 7 October 2011
 
Personal tools