Thread history

From Talk:Darkcanuck/RRServer
Viewing a history listing
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Time User Activity Comment
15:51, 17 February 2012 GrubbmGait (talk | contribs) New reply created (Reply to retiring ELO column)
20:00, 15 February 2012 MN (talk | contribs) New reply created (Reply to retiring ELO column)
19:51, 15 February 2012 Chase-san (talk | contribs) New reply created (Reply to retiring ELO column)
17:53, 15 February 2012 Jdev (talk | contribs) New reply created (Reply to retiring ELO column)
16:50, 15 February 2012 Rednaxela (talk | contribs) New reply created (Reply to retiring ELO column)
08:55, 15 February 2012 Skilgannon (talk | contribs) New reply created (Reply to retiring ELO column)
22:07, 14 February 2012 Voidious (talk | contribs) New thread created  

retiring ELO column

Now that everyone's ELO rating is subzero in General 1v1 =), is it maybe time to retire it altogether?

Voidious22:07, 14 February 2012

I'm all for it =) Although, doesn't the LRP depend on ELO data? Maybe shift that over to Glicko data instead? And if there was some way to make the LRP show the 'expected' option by default... that would make my day =)

Skilgannon08:55, 15 February 2012
 

I'd also support removal of ELO from the rumble, and replacing it with Glicko or Glicko2 in the places that use it (LRP).

Rednaxela16:50, 15 February 2012
 

I also agree

Jdev17:53, 15 February 2012
 

Yeah, ELO doesn't do much anymore. So agreed as well.

Chase-san19:51, 15 February 2012
 

Elo is working fine, even with negative scores, but keeping both Elo and Glicko-2 is redundant. So, removing one of them is fine by me.

MN20:00, 15 February 2012
 

Luckily we still have the music . . .

GrubbmGait15:51, 17 February 2012