http://robowiki.net/w/index.php?title=Thread:Talk:DrussGT/Version_History/3.1.3DC_vs_3.1.3/reply_(6)&feed=atom&action=historyThread:Talk:DrussGT/Version History/3.1.3DC vs 3.1.3/reply (6) - Revision history2024-03-28T12:58:30ZRevision history for this page on the wikiMediaWiki 1.34.1http://robowiki.net/w/index.php?title=Thread:Talk:DrussGT/Version_History/3.1.3DC_vs_3.1.3/reply_(6)&diff=33018&oldid=prevVoidious: Reply to 3.1.3DC vs 3.1.32014-01-14T00:03:26Z<p>Reply to <a href="/wiki/Thread:Talk:DrussGT/Version_History/3.1.3DC_vs_3.1.3/reply_(5)" title="Thread:Talk:DrussGT/Version History/3.1.3DC vs 3.1.3/reply (5)">3.1.3DC vs 3.1.3</a></p>
<p><b>New page</b></p><div>In my mind, a tree is more heavyweight than a buffer. You need multiple buffers to begin to approximate the smoothing you get from KNN and kernel density. I use multiple trees in my surfing for the same reasons, but more on the order of 10 than 100.</div>Voidious