Thread:Talk:Dynamic Clustering/Using previous GFs as dimensions/reply (13)

From RoboWiki
(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
 
m (edit: weaken that assertion ;))
 
Line 1: Line 1:
I'm just curious if they're being treated independently. A sequence like 0, 0.2, 0.4, 0.6, 0.8 actually seems quite close to 0.2, 0.4, 0.6, 0.8, 1.0, but if they're all treated independently, your classification won't see it that way.
+
I'm just curious if they're being treated independently. A sequence like 0, 0.2, 0.4, 0.6, 0.8 actually might be quite close to 0.2, 0.4, 0.6, 0.8, 1.0, but if they're all treated independently, your classification won't see it that way.

Latest revision as of 17:31, 20 December 2013

I'm just curious if they're being treated independently. A sequence like 0, 0.2, 0.4, 0.6, 0.8 actually might be quite close to 0.2, 0.4, 0.6, 0.8, 1.0, but if they're all treated independently, your classification won't see it that way.

Personal tools