http://robowiki.net/w/index.php?title=Thread:Talk:LiteRumble/Rankings_Stable/reply&feed=atom&action=historyThread:Talk:LiteRumble/Rankings Stable/reply - Revision history2024-03-28T15:55:28ZRevision history for this page on the wikiMediaWiki 1.34.1http://robowiki.net/w/index.php?title=Thread:Talk:LiteRumble/Rankings_Stable/reply&diff=54390&oldid=prevBeaming: Reply to Rankings Stable2018-06-17T14:57:40Z<p>Reply to <a href="/wiki/Thread:Talk:LiteRumble/Rankings_Stable" title="Thread:Talk:LiteRumble/Rankings Stable">Rankings Stable</a></p>
<p><b>New page</b></p><div>Your observation coincide with mine. Once all bots paired with each other at least once, the ranking get the stable status. Sometimes it does not happen for a long time because of missing bots or some bots crashing with a newer version of robocode. This is why the participants list sometimes get pruned.<br />
<br />
If the ranking is unstable for a long time, I usually look which bot is missing a pair and search for a reason in the rumble client log.<br />
<br />
Usually, stabilization takes about a day for each new bot.</div>Beaming