http://robowiki.net/w/index.php?title=Thread:Talk:Maximum_Escape_Angle/Precise_Positional/Non-Iterative/Old_discussion_on_the_shape_of_escape_envelope/reply&feed=atom&action=historyThread:Talk:Maximum Escape Angle/Precise Positional/Non-Iterative/Old discussion on the shape of escape envelope/reply - Revision history2024-03-28T19:42:20ZRevision history for this page on the wikiMediaWiki 1.34.1http://robowiki.net/w/index.php?title=Thread:Talk:Maximum_Escape_Angle/Precise_Positional/Non-Iterative/Old_discussion_on_the_shape_of_escape_envelope/reply&diff=55894&oldid=prevDsekercioglu: Reply to Old discussion on the shape of escape envelope2019-08-07T12:38:34Z<p>Reply to <a href="/wiki/Thread:Talk:Maximum_Escape_Angle/Precise_Positional/Non-Iterative/Old_discussion_on_the_shape_of_escape_envelope" title="Thread:Talk:Maximum Escape Angle/Precise Positional/Non-Iterative/Old discussion on the shape of escape envelope">Old discussion on the shape of escape envelope</a></p>
<p><b>New page</b></p><div>I had always thought of this as a way of using guess factors in twin duel or team battles. The advantage it has over PIF and Displacement Vectors is that those two can actually go out of MEA in some cases. I have also been working on a mathematical formula but you know me, trigonometry is not my area of expertise =)</div>Dsekercioglu