Difference between revisions of "Thread:Talk:RoboRunner/priorities/reply (6)"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Reply to priorities) |
(er, not so fast...) |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
So on your extra machine, you do #1, and on your primary machine you do #2, and voila! | So on your extra machine, you do #1, and on your primary machine you do #2, and voila! | ||
| + | |||
| + | Edit: Except for copying the necessary bot JARs. That would be a little more complicated. | ||
Latest revision as of 20:47, 31 July 2012
This could actually work really smoothly. By default, it spins up the processes as now, but passing a port number to each process and communicating over TCP/IP. The data sent / received could remain the same. Then we could add command line arguments for:
- Launching Robocode processes and doing nothing, just listening for commands.
- Accepting a list of host:port of additional processes. In addition to the normal processes, launch a thread for each remote process.
So on your extra machine, you do #1, and on your primary machine you do #2, and voila!
Edit: Except for copying the necessary bot JARs. That would be a little more complicated.
