Difference between revisions of "Thread:User talk:Kev/BeepBoop seems to be losing ~1.5 APS"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(New thread: BeepBoop seems to be losing ~1.5 APS) |
m (add archive.org link) |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
Comparing to the nearly identical 1.20, you can clearly see some random drops, which I suspect to be skipped turns on some old hardware. | Comparing to the nearly identical 1.20, you can clearly see some random drops, which I suspect to be skipped turns on some old hardware. | ||
| − | The previous results of APS ~94.8 can be reproduced on my computer, so I think the previous results can be trusted. | + | The [https://web.archive.org/web/20221206182727/http://literumble.appspot.com/Rankings?game=roborumble previous results of APS ~94.8] can be reproduced on my computer, so I think the previous results can be trusted. |
@[[User:Beaming|Beaming]] seems to be contributing to RoboRumble the most recently, we could work together to see if something could be done to ensure reproducibility of RoboRumble. | @[[User:Beaming|Beaming]] seems to be contributing to RoboRumble the most recently, we could work together to see if something could be done to ensure reproducibility of RoboRumble. | ||
Latest revision as of 09:45, 15 January 2023
Comparing to the nearly identical 1.20, you can clearly see some random drops, which I suspect to be skipped turns on some old hardware.
The previous results of APS ~94.8 can be reproduced on my computer, so I think the previous results can be trusted.
@Beaming seems to be contributing to RoboRumble the most recently, we could work together to see if something could be done to ensure reproducibility of RoboRumble.
