Difference between revisions of "Thread:User talk:Wolfman/RoboRumble/reply (4)"

From Robowiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m (Reply to RoboRumble)
 
m (elaborate)
 
Line 1: Line 1:
 
The consensus on the pre-stored data kind of "allowed, but considered cheesy". We have one such example in the Nanorumble (See [[LittleBlackBook|LBB]]), and it's generally considered to be an amusing novelty rather than a serious competitor because it does this.
 
The consensus on the pre-stored data kind of "allowed, but considered cheesy". We have one such example in the Nanorumble (See [[LittleBlackBook|LBB]]), and it's generally considered to be an amusing novelty rather than a serious competitor because it does this.
 +
 +
In the upper ranks of the megabot rumble, it would probably be considered bad form unless it's a one-off experiment of "let's see how well this does", which would be considered interesting instead of bad form.

Latest revision as of 15:14, 27 November 2013

The consensus on the pre-stored data kind of "allowed, but considered cheesy". We have one such example in the Nanorumble (See LBB), and it's generally considered to be an amusing novelty rather than a serious competitor because it does this.

In the upper ranks of the megabot rumble, it would probably be considered bad form unless it's a one-off experiment of "let's see how well this does", which would be considered interesting instead of bad form.