Hickup in rankings

Fragment of a discussion from Talk:LiteRumble
← Thread:Talk:LiteRumble/Hickup in rankings/reply (2)

Jump to navigation Jump to search

You do not have permission to edit this page, for the following reasons:

The action you have requested is limited to users in the group: Users.
You must confirm your email address before editing pages. Please set and validate your email address through your user preferences.

You can view and copy the source of this page.

That happens once every a few years ;( Maybe LiteRumble should have some check to prevent removing more than 100 bots at a time?
Anyway LiteRumble *is* smart enough to recover with only 2000+ battles (1000+ to add back, 1000+ again to fix pairings), instead of 1000000 battles.

Return to Thread:Talk:LiteRumble/Hickup in rankings/reply (2).

However a bug in the rumble client actually prioritized already existing bots over bots without ranking, except in the clean run case. So it actually takes much more battles to add missing bots back ;(

I submitted a PR for this bug. https://github.com/robo-code/robocode/pull/61.

Bots without rank should always take highest priority, in all scenarios.

Retrieved from "http://robowiki.net/wiki/Thread:Talk:LiteRumble/Hickup_in_rankings/reply_(2)#Hickup_in_rankings_6873"