Talk:RoboRumble/Participants - Revision history

Skotty: /* Super Slowbot */ indeed

2011-07-19T02:31:31Z

Super Slowbot: indeed

Chase-san: /* Super Slowbot */

2011-07-17T17:07:03Z

Super Slowbot

GrubbmGait: /* Super Slowbot */ Centaur sure is

2011-07-17T16:47:38Z

Super Slowbot: Centaur sure is

Voidious: /* Super Slowbot */ Diamond ain't that slow either :P

2011-07-17T15:30:44Z

Super Slowbot: Diamond ain't that slow either :P

Rednaxela: /* Super Slowbot */ Shadow ain't so slow

2011-07-17T07:06:39Z

Super Slowbot: Shadow ain't so slow

Chase-san: /* Super Slowbot */ new section

2011-07-17T06:37:00Z

Super Slowbot: new section

Chase-san: /* Removing duplicates */

2011-07-14T02:10:48Z

Removing duplicates

Voidious: /* Removing duplicates */ couple days, couple years, whatever :-P

2011-07-14T01:53:35Z

Removing duplicates: couple days, couple years, whatever :-P

Darkcanuck: /* Removing duplicates */ now?

2011-07-13T03:55:50Z

Removing duplicates: now?

Chase-san: /* Sample bot */ okay okay

2011-07-05T09:25:05Z

Sample bot: okay okay

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:31, 19 July 2011
Line 203:		Line 203:

	: Sorry didn't mean to insult anyone with my reference. Two top surfers vs each other are usually the slowest battles. I just picked two I particularly liked. — <span style="font-family: monospace">[[User:Chase-san\|Chase]]-[[User_talk:Chase-san\|san]]</span> 17:07, 17 July 2011 (UTC)		: Sorry didn't mean to insult anyone with my reference. Two top surfers vs each other are usually the slowest battles. I just picked two I particularly liked. — <span style="font-family: monospace">[[User:Chase-san\|Chase]]-[[User_talk:Chase-san\|san]]</span> 17:07, 17 July 2011 (UTC)
		+
		+	:Centaur 0.6.5 is indeed very slooooow to run. If I didn't have other things to do, I would go play with it manually and see if it's skipping a lot of turns or doing other odd things. -- [[User:Skotty\|Skotty]] 02:31, 19 July 2011 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:07, 17 July 2011
Line 201:		Line 201:

	: Yep, Centaur makes my system crawl, even against a samplebot. Battles between two topbots can take longer, not particularly because they are slowbots, but because they perform on par, stretching battles to the last drop of energy. --[[User:GrubbmGait\|GrubbmGait]] 16:47, 17 July 2011 (UTC)		: Yep, Centaur makes my system crawl, even against a samplebot. Battles between two topbots can take longer, not particularly because they are slowbots, but because they perform on par, stretching battles to the last drop of energy. --[[User:GrubbmGait\|GrubbmGait]] 16:47, 17 July 2011 (UTC)
		+
		+	: Sorry didn't mean to insult anyone with my reference. Two top surfers vs each other are usually the slowest battles. I just picked two I particularly liked. — <span style="font-family: monospace">[[User:Chase-san\|Chase]]-[[User_talk:Chase-san\|san]]</span> 17:07, 17 July 2011 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:47, 17 July 2011
Line 199:		Line 199:

	: Diamond's not particularly slow either, at least compared to other surfers... [[Anti-Surfer Challenge/Pre-Chat]] has a good comparison of CPU speed of various surfing movements, though it might be slightly out of date (like I bet [[DrussGT]] is faster now). --[[User:Voidious\|Voidious]] 15:30, 17 July 2011 (UTC)		: Diamond's not particularly slow either, at least compared to other surfers... [[Anti-Surfer Challenge/Pre-Chat]] has a good comparison of CPU speed of various surfing movements, though it might be slightly out of date (like I bet [[DrussGT]] is faster now). --[[User:Voidious\|Voidious]] 15:30, 17 July 2011 (UTC)
		+
		+	: Yep, Centaur makes my system crawl, even against a samplebot. Battles between two topbots can take longer, not particularly because they are slowbots, but because they perform on par, stretching battles to the last drop of energy. --[[User:GrubbmGait\|GrubbmGait]] 16:47, 17 July 2011 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:30, 17 July 2011
Line 197:		Line 197:

	: I haven't noticed whether or not Cenetaur is slow for me, but just as a note, "Diamond against Shadow" is not something I'd expect to be hugely slow anyway as far as things go, since Shadow is one of the fasted high-ranking bots last I checked. --[[User:Rednaxela\|Rednaxela]] 07:06, 17 July 2011 (UTC)		: I haven't noticed whether or not Cenetaur is slow for me, but just as a note, "Diamond against Shadow" is not something I'd expect to be hugely slow anyway as far as things go, since Shadow is one of the fasted high-ranking bots last I checked. --[[User:Rednaxela\|Rednaxela]] 07:06, 17 July 2011 (UTC)
		+
		+	: Diamond's not particularly slow either, at least compared to other surfers... [[Anti-Surfer Challenge/Pre-Chat]] has a good comparison of CPU speed of various surfing movements, though it might be slightly out of date (like I bet [[DrussGT]] is faster now). --[[User:Voidious\|Voidious]] 15:30, 17 July 2011 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 07:06, 17 July 2011
Line 195:		Line 195:

	I noticed my rumble client grind to a near halt when running gf.Centaur.Centaur against any other bot, its slower then pitting Diamond against Shadow. Anyone else getting similar behavior? — <span style="font-family: monospace">[[User:Chase-san\|Chase]]-[[User_talk:Chase-san\|san]]</span> 06:36, 17 July 2011 (UTC)		I noticed my rumble client grind to a near halt when running gf.Centaur.Centaur against any other bot, its slower then pitting Diamond against Shadow. Anyone else getting similar behavior? — <span style="font-family: monospace">[[User:Chase-san\|Chase]]-[[User_talk:Chase-san\|san]]</span> 06:36, 17 July 2011 (UTC)
		+
		+	: I haven't noticed whether or not Cenetaur is slow for me, but just as a note, "Diamond against Shadow" is not something I'd expect to be hugely slow anyway as far as things go, since Shadow is one of the fasted high-ranking bots last I checked. --[[User:Rednaxela\|Rednaxela]] 07:06, 17 July 2011 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 06:37, 17 July 2011
Line 191:		Line 191:

	I still personally think we should at some point do a major trim on the number of participants, or have a Rumble2 (with only new/er participants), but I thought they were removed for the reason Nat originally posted. If you they serve as good references for beginners that is fine, I won't object. — <span style="font-family: monospace">[[User:Chase-san\|Chase]]-[[User_talk:Chase-san\|san]]</span> 09:25, 5 July 2011 (UTC)		I still personally think we should at some point do a major trim on the number of participants, or have a Rumble2 (with only new/er participants), but I thought they were removed for the reason Nat originally posted. If you they serve as good references for beginners that is fine, I won't object. — <span style="font-family: monospace">[[User:Chase-san\|Chase]]-[[User_talk:Chase-san\|san]]</span> 09:25, 5 July 2011 (UTC)
		+
		+	== Super Slowbot ==
		+
		+	I noticed my rumble client grind to a near halt when running gf.Centaur.Centaur against any other bot, its slower then pitting Diamond against Shadow. Anyone else getting similar behavior? — <span style="font-family: monospace">[[User:Chase-san\|Chase]]-[[User_talk:Chase-san\|san]]</span> 06:36, 17 July 2011 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:10, 14 July 2011
Line 102:		Line 102:

	Wow, that was a long time ago. Finally removed the ones that hadn't been already. Also skimmed the participants list and didn't notice any other duplicate versions. --[[User:Voidious\|Voidious]] 01:53, 14 July 2011 (UTC)		Wow, that was a long time ago. Finally removed the ones that hadn't been already. Also skimmed the participants list and didn't notice any other duplicate versions. --[[User:Voidious\|Voidious]] 01:53, 14 July 2011 (UTC)
		+
		+	Melee list, gg.Wolverine and wiki.Wolverine, wiki.Wolverine is a fixed version of gg.Wolverine (probably shouldn't have ever have been changed from gg now that I think about it). — <span style="font-family: monospace">[[User:Chase-san\|Chase]]-[[User_talk:Chase-san\|san]]</span> 02:10, 14 July 2011 (UTC)

	== Removal of crashing bots ==		== Removal of crashing bots ==

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:53, 14 July 2011
Line 100:		Line 100:

	I completely agree as well, I will probably be removing a number of out dated or test robots of mine (such as prototype, sou, orbit, and problembot). Also duplicates and robots that crash often or have to be stopped by robocode, or that use problematic methods (such as the static reference of Advanced/Team robot). These should be removed, unless they can be repaired, or if some reason exists for retaining them. For example gg.Wolverine I repaired a long time ago to keep it from losing battles due to calls to getXX. But it wasn't a simple fix. — <span style="font-family: monospace">[[User:Chase-san\|Chase]]-[[User_talk:Chase-san\|san]]</span> 14:56, 24 July 2010 (UTC)		I completely agree as well, I will probably be removing a number of out dated or test robots of mine (such as prototype, sou, orbit, and problembot). Also duplicates and robots that crash often or have to be stopped by robocode, or that use problematic methods (such as the static reference of Advanced/Team robot). These should be removed, unless they can be repaired, or if some reason exists for retaining them. For example gg.Wolverine I repaired a long time ago to keep it from losing battles due to calls to getXX. But it wasn't a simple fix. — <span style="font-family: monospace">[[User:Chase-san\|Chase]]-[[User_talk:Chase-san\|san]]</span> 14:56, 24 July 2010 (UTC)
		+
		+	Wow, that was a long time ago. Finally removed the ones that hadn't been already. Also skimmed the participants list and didn't notice any other duplicate versions. --[[User:Voidious\|Voidious]] 01:53, 14 July 2011 (UTC)

	== Removal of crashing bots ==		== Removal of crashing bots ==

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:55, 13 July 2011
Line 96:		Line 96:

	Cool - I'll give this another couple days before removing any of the dups myself. zyx, that's funny =), and if they are indeed different bots, of course feel free to leave them both in. GrubbmGait, well said, I completely agree. Positive, I personally agree about bots that crash frequently (DogManSPE and SmallDevil come to mind), but IIRC, I suggested removing DogManSPE once before and met with some resistance. =) --[[User:Voidious\|Voidious]] 17:02, 10 October 2009 (UTC)		Cool - I'll give this another couple days before removing any of the dups myself. zyx, that's funny =), and if they are indeed different bots, of course feel free to leave them both in. GrubbmGait, well said, I completely agree. Positive, I personally agree about bots that crash frequently (DogManSPE and SmallDevil come to mind), but IIRC, I suggested removing DogManSPE once before and met with some resistance. =) --[[User:Voidious\|Voidious]] 17:02, 10 October 2009 (UTC)
		+
		+	: I think you may have forgotten to do this... --[[User:Darkcanuck\|Darkcanuck]] 03:55, 13 July 2011 (UTC)

	I completely agree as well, I will probably be removing a number of out dated or test robots of mine (such as prototype, sou, orbit, and problembot). Also duplicates and robots that crash often or have to be stopped by robocode, or that use problematic methods (such as the static reference of Advanced/Team robot). These should be removed, unless they can be repaired, or if some reason exists for retaining them. For example gg.Wolverine I repaired a long time ago to keep it from losing battles due to calls to getXX. But it wasn't a simple fix. — <span style="font-family: monospace">[[User:Chase-san\|Chase]]-[[User_talk:Chase-san\|san]]</span> 14:56, 24 July 2010 (UTC)		I completely agree as well, I will probably be removing a number of out dated or test robots of mine (such as prototype, sou, orbit, and problembot). Also duplicates and robots that crash often or have to be stopped by robocode, or that use problematic methods (such as the static reference of Advanced/Team robot). These should be removed, unless they can be repaired, or if some reason exists for retaining them. For example gg.Wolverine I repaired a long time ago to keep it from losing battles due to calls to getXX. But it wasn't a simple fix. — <span style="font-family: monospace">[[User:Chase-san\|Chase]]-[[User_talk:Chase-san\|san]]</span> 14:56, 24 July 2010 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:25, 5 July 2011
Line 183:		Line 183:

	I'd disagree with ''"And there are worse bots in the rumble and nobody complains about them"'', because there has been complaining about those others sometimes... Overall I feel neutral about the presence of the sample bots, because they do have the redeeming quality of being decent reference points for beginners. --[[User:Rednaxela\|Rednaxela]] 02:59, 5 July 2011 (UTC)		I'd disagree with ''"And there are worse bots in the rumble and nobody complains about them"'', because there has been complaining about those others sometimes... Overall I feel neutral about the presence of the sample bots, because they do have the redeeming quality of being decent reference points for beginners. --[[User:Rednaxela\|Rednaxela]] 02:59, 5 July 2011 (UTC)
		+
		+	I still personally think we should at some point do a major trim on the number of participants, or have a Rumble2 (with only new/er participants), but I thought they were removed for the reason Nat originally posted. If you they serve as good references for beginners that is fine, I won't object. — <span style="font-family: monospace">[[User:Chase-san\|Chase]]-[[User_talk:Chase-san\|san]]</span> 09:25, 5 July 2011 (UTC)