http://robowiki.net/w/index.php?action=history&feed=atom&title=Thread%3ATalk%3A%C3%89p%C3%A9eist%2FCode_mods%2Freply_%2816%29Thread:Talk:Épéeist/Code mods/reply (16) - Revision history2026-04-16T20:01:16ZRevision history for this page on the wikiMediaWiki 1.34.1http://robowiki.net/w/index.php?title=Thread:Talk:%C3%89p%C3%A9eist/Code_mods/reply_(16)&diff=29870&oldid=prevSheldor: Reply to Code mods2013-03-20T20:02:42Z<p>Reply to <a href="/wiki/Thread:Talk:%C3%89p%C3%A9eist/Code_mods/reply_(13)" title="Thread:Talk:Épéeist/Code mods/reply (13)">Code mods</a></p>
<p><b>New page</b></p><div>Awesome!!!<br />
<br />
Power 3's are fine, especially since the distancing is so aggressive. Though, if you're not worried about rambots, 2.667 might be a better general purpose bullet power.<br />
<br />
Getting the <code>setAdjustGunForRobotTurn(true);</code> back is low-priority, but if you can fit it, go ahead. On my compiler, <code>setAdjustGunForRobotTurn(true);</code> costs 5 bytes, not 4. If it doesn't fit, we can save a byte by switching the constant in the energy monitoring code from 1.09 to 1, though it would be slightly less accurate. I forgot to mention that earlier. Oops.</div>Sheldor