http://robowiki.net/w/index.php?action=history&feed=atom&title=Thread%3ATalk%3ACurve_flattening%2FShooting_Curve_Flatteners%2Freply_%285%29 2026-04-11T11:20:18Z Revision history for this page on the wiki MediaWiki 1.34.1 http://robowiki.net/w/index.php?title=Thread:Talk:Curve_flattening/Shooting_Curve_Flatteners/reply_(5)&diff=37285&oldid=prev 2017-08-05T01:49:06Z

<p></p> <table class="diff diff-contentalign-left" data-mw="interface"> <col class="diff-marker" /> <col class="diff-content" /> <col class="diff-marker" /> <col class="diff-content" /> <tr class="diff-title" lang="en"> <td colspan="2" style="background-color: #fff; color: #222; text-align: center;">← Older revision</td> <td colspan="2" style="background-color: #fff; color: #222; text-align: center;">Revision as of 01:49, 5 August 2017</td> </tr><tr><td colspan="2" class="diff-lineno" id="mw-diff-left-l1" >Line 1:</td> <td colspan="2" class="diff-lineno">Line 1:</td></tr> <tr><td class='diff-marker'> </td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #222; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>There is a problem with this approach. Typically, you have about 10 sectors</div></td><td class='diff-marker'> </td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #222; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>There is a problem with this approach. Typically, you have about 10 sectors</div></td></tr> <tr><td class='diff-marker'> </td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #222; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>to shoot (if we divide guess factor range, by the bot body). Good curve flattener could be anywhere in a random fashion, even in just visited sector.</div></td><td class='diff-marker'> </td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #222; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>to shoot (if we divide guess factor range, by the bot body). Good curve flattener could be anywhere in a random fashion, even in just visited sector.</div></td></tr> <tr><td class='diff-marker'>−</td><td style="color: #222; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #ffe49c; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>So at best you increased your chances to 1/9 vs 1/10, in practice it is still 1/10. I have a random gun among list of available ones <del class="diffchange diffchange-inline">form </del>my bots, often it gives the best result against curve flatteners. Sometimes, antiguess factor would lead you in wrong direction: I think [[DrussGT]] avoids GF=0, but with negative weight for visited spots, you soon will fire at GF=0 only, and unavoidably lose.</div></td><td class='diff-marker'>+</td><td style="color: #222; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>So at best you increased your chances to 1/9 vs 1/10, in practice it is still 1/10. I have a random gun among list of available ones <ins class="diffchange diffchange-inline">for </ins>my bots, often it gives the best result against curve flatteners. Sometimes, antiguess factor would lead you in wrong direction: I think [[DrussGT]] avoids GF=0, but with negative weight for visited spots, you soon will fire at GF=0 only, and unavoidably lose.</div></td></tr> <tr><td class='diff-marker'> </td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #222; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"></td><td class='diff-marker'> </td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #222; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"></td></tr> <tr><td class='diff-marker'> </td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #222; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>My strategy just fire randomly in this case, at least you get a chance to hit.</div></td><td class='diff-marker'> </td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #222; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>My strategy just fire randomly in this case, at least you get a chance to hit.</div></td></tr> </table>

Beaming http://robowiki.net/w/index.php?title=Thread:Talk:Curve_flattening/Shooting_Curve_Flatteners/reply_(5)&diff=37284&oldid=prev 2017-08-05T01:48:14Z

<p>Reply to <a href="/wiki/Thread:Talk:Curve_flattening/Shooting_Curve_Flatteners/reply" title="Thread:Talk:Curve flattening/Shooting Curve Flatteners/reply">Shooting Curve Flatteners</a></p> <p><b>New page</b></p><div>There is a problem with this approach. Typically, you have about 10 sectors<br /> to shoot (if we divide guess factor range, by the bot body). Good curve flattener could be anywhere in a random fashion, even in just visited sector.<br /> So at best you increased your chances to 1/9 vs 1/10, in practice it is still 1/10. I have a random gun among list of available ones form my bots, often it gives the best result against curve flatteners. Sometimes, antiguess factor would lead you in wrong direction: I think [[DrussGT]] avoids GF=0, but with negative weight for visited spots, you soon will fire at GF=0 only, and unavoidably lose.<br /> <br /> My strategy just fire randomly in this case, at least you get a chance to hit.</div>

Beaming