<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
	<id>http://robowiki.net/w/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=Thread%3ATalk%3ADiamond%2FVersion_History%2Ffading_weights%2Freply_%286%29</id>
	<title>Thread:Talk:Diamond/Version History/fading weights/reply (6) - Revision history</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://robowiki.net/w/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=Thread%3ATalk%3ADiamond%2FVersion_History%2Ffading_weights%2Freply_%286%29"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://robowiki.net/w/index.php?title=Thread:Talk:Diamond/Version_History/fading_weights/reply_(6)&amp;action=history"/>
	<updated>2026-04-30T03:01:26Z</updated>
	<subtitle>Revision history for this page on the wiki</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.34.1</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>http://robowiki.net/w/index.php?title=Thread:Talk:Diamond/Version_History/fading_weights/reply_(6)&amp;diff=25385&amp;oldid=prev</id>
		<title>Voidious: Reply to fading weights</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://robowiki.net/w/index.php?title=Thread:Talk:Diamond/Version_History/fading_weights/reply_(6)&amp;diff=25385&amp;oldid=prev"/>
		<updated>2012-06-29T17:25:19Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Reply to &lt;a href=&quot;/wiki/Thread:Talk:Diamond/Version_History/fading_weights&quot; title=&quot;Thread:Talk:Diamond/Version History/fading weights&quot;&gt;fading weights&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;New page&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div&gt;Orrrrr I've been chasing ghosts... In my 2,000 battle benchmark (250 bots x 8 seasons), 1.7.29 came in 0.18 above 1.7.37 and a dev version of 1.7.35 got the exact same score as 1.7.37. Rolling back individual changes gave me anywhere from 0.14 to 0.22 below 1.7.29's score. Then I recompiled 1.7.29, checked the class files came out the same (ie, I had the right source), and reran 10 seasons... and came in 0.14 below 1.7.29.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Another good reason to focus on big improvements: anything else is too small / painful to reliably benchmark. =)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Voidious</name></author>
		
	</entry>
</feed>