<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
	<id>http://robowiki.net/w/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=Thread%3ATalk%3ADiamond%2FVersion_History%2Fgun_tuning_tangent%2Freply_%286%29</id>
	<title>Thread:Talk:Diamond/Version History/gun tuning tangent/reply (6) - Revision history</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://robowiki.net/w/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=Thread%3ATalk%3ADiamond%2FVersion_History%2Fgun_tuning_tangent%2Freply_%286%29"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://robowiki.net/w/index.php?title=Thread:Talk:Diamond/Version_History/gun_tuning_tangent/reply_(6)&amp;action=history"/>
	<updated>2026-04-12T05:04:49Z</updated>
	<subtitle>Revision history for this page on the wiki</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.34.1</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>http://robowiki.net/w/index.php?title=Thread:Talk:Diamond/Version_History/gun_tuning_tangent/reply_(6)&amp;diff=25599&amp;oldid=prev</id>
		<title>Skilgannon: Reply to gun tuning tangent</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://robowiki.net/w/index.php?title=Thread:Talk:Diamond/Version_History/gun_tuning_tangent/reply_(6)&amp;diff=25599&amp;oldid=prev"/>
		<updated>2012-07-11T15:42:49Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Reply to &lt;a href=&quot;/wiki/Thread:Talk:Diamond/Version_History/gun_tuning_tangent/reply&quot; title=&quot;Thread:Talk:Diamond/Version History/gun tuning tangent/reply&quot;&gt;gun tuning tangent&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;New page&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div&gt;My thoughts with [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Principal_component_analysis PCA] would be that we could eliminate a large number of the dimensions stored in the tree by only taking the X main components, and make a transform which combines a large number of measurements from all sorts of things which aren't even very useful and turn them into a much more information-dense, lower dimension location. This would save on memory as well as search time while still keeping pretty much exactly the same results.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I agree that far too much effort has been put into refining weights, but it does have its place for ekking out that extra little bit of performance against a known population.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Skilgannon</name></author>
		
	</entry>
</feed>