http://robowiki.net/w/index.php?action=history&feed=atom&title=Thread%3ATalk%3AGilgalad%2FmovementStrategy%2FDC_and_VCS%2Freply_%283%29Thread:Talk:Gilgalad/movementStrategy/DC and VCS/reply (3) - Revision history2026-04-04T11:45:30ZRevision history for this page on the wikiMediaWiki 1.34.1http://robowiki.net/w/index.php?title=Thread:Talk:Gilgalad/movementStrategy/DC_and_VCS/reply_(3)&diff=24578&oldid=prevMN: Reply to DC and VCS2012-05-29T16:14:08Z<p>Reply to <a href="/wiki/Thread:Talk:Gilgalad/movementStrategy/DC_and_VCS/reply_(2)" title="Thread:Talk:Gilgalad/movementStrategy/DC and VCS/reply (2)">DC and VCS</a></p>
<p><b>New page</b></p><div>[[DrussGT]] uses a "bullets shot" classifier to give higher weight to newer data and works somewhat like data decay. It makes k-NN search extrapolate a bit, but still helps increase the score against learning opponents.<br />
<br />
IMHO, the advantage of VCS over DC is CPU performance. But VCS compresses data into bins and some information is lost, while in DC it isn´t. So, well tuned DC should perform better than well tuned VCS, unless you start skipping turns.</div>MN