<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
	<id>http://robowiki.net/w/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=Thread%3ATalk%3AMain_Page%2Ffunny_%22Robocode_has_peaked%22_quote%2Freply_%2812%29</id>
	<title>Thread:Talk:Main Page/funny &quot;Robocode has peaked&quot; quote/reply (12) - Revision history</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://robowiki.net/w/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=Thread%3ATalk%3AMain_Page%2Ffunny_%22Robocode_has_peaked%22_quote%2Freply_%2812%29"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://robowiki.net/w/index.php?title=Thread:Talk:Main_Page/funny_%22Robocode_has_peaked%22_quote/reply_(12)&amp;action=history"/>
	<updated>2026-04-04T21:21:29Z</updated>
	<subtitle>Revision history for this page on the wiki</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.34.1</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>http://robowiki.net/w/index.php?title=Thread:Talk:Main_Page/funny_%22Robocode_has_peaked%22_quote/reply_(12)&amp;diff=26966&amp;oldid=prev</id>
		<title>MN: Reply to funny &quot;Robocode has peaked&quot; quote</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://robowiki.net/w/index.php?title=Thread:Talk:Main_Page/funny_%22Robocode_has_peaked%22_quote/reply_(12)&amp;diff=26966&amp;oldid=prev"/>
		<updated>2012-09-25T21:25:46Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Reply to &lt;a href=&quot;/wiki/Thread:Talk:Main_Page/funny_%22Robocode_has_peaked%22_quote/reply_(9)&quot; title=&quot;Thread:Talk:Main Page/funny &amp;quot;Robocode has peaked&amp;quot; quote/reply (9)&quot;&gt;funny &amp;quot;Robocode has peaked&amp;quot; quote&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;New page&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div&gt;Oops, NP-complete means the perfect move can´t be easily calculated. NP stands for Non-Polynomial runtime complexity.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But yes, imperfect information is a key feature in Robocode.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Perfect information and imperfect information usually leads to 2 completely different paths. The first leading to backward induction style analysis and the second leading to forward induction.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>MN</name></author>
		
	</entry>
</feed>