http://robowiki.net/w/index.php?action=history&feed=atom&title=Thread%3ATalk%3AMain_Page%2Ffunny_%22Robocode_has_peaked%22_quote%2Freply_%2817%29 2026-04-10T20:57:14Z Revision history for this page on the wiki MediaWiki 1.34.1 http://robowiki.net/w/index.php?title=Thread:Talk:Main_Page/funny_%22Robocode_has_peaked%22_quote/reply_(17)&diff=26985&oldid=prev 2012-09-27T14:24:05Z

<p>Reply to <a href="/wiki/Thread:Talk:Main_Page/funny_%22Robocode_has_peaked%22_quote/reply_(16)" title="Thread:Talk:Main Page/funny &quot;Robocode has peaked&quot; quote/reply (16)">funny &quot;Robocode has peaked&quot; quote</a></p> <p><b>New page</b></p><div>At sufficiently close range, perfect dodging and perfect shielding would not be possible. While strategies besides rambots might be viable, they would need to be close range strategies.<br /> <br /> As an aside, robocode with tick-bullets (even with invisible bullets) could be interesting. With the currently usual bullet power values, I'd suspect that would make it possible though, for bots to make wide enough bullet interesection &quot;shadows&quot; in waves to always stay 100% safe. With smaller faster ones that might not be such a stalemate though.</div>

Rednaxela