http://robowiki.net/w/index.php?action=history&feed=atom&title=Thread%3ATalk%3ARoboResearch%2Fnew_Robocode_batch_battle_runner%2Freply_%282%29Thread:Talk:RoboResearch/new Robocode batch battle runner/reply (2) - Revision history2026-04-30T16:23:11ZRevision history for this page on the wikiMediaWiki 1.34.1http://robowiki.net/w/index.php?title=Thread:Talk:RoboResearch/new_Robocode_batch_battle_runner/reply_(2)&diff=25841&oldid=prevVoidious: Reply to new Robocode batch battle runner2012-07-21T03:11:24Z<p>Reply to <a href="/wiki/Thread:Talk:RoboResearch/new_Robocode_batch_battle_runner/reply" title="Thread:Talk:RoboResearch/new Robocode batch battle runner/reply">new Robocode batch battle runner</a></p>
<p><b>New page</b></p><div>I really should take a look at what you have there, I've never tried it. Though I think I'm looking for something a bit simpler and lightweight. Does the client do multiple threads with multiple Robocode engines? Or do you just have to configure one client per thread, like with RoboRumble clients?<br />
<br />
I just whipped up the core battle runner, which takes paths to multiple Robocode install directories, then runs a collection of battles across the threads using the control API. Though that's pretty much the easy part... =)</div>Voidious