http://robowiki.net/w/index.php?action=history&feed=atom&title=Thread%3ATalk%3ARoboRumble%2F30_day_battle_records%2Freply_%2835%29Thread:Talk:RoboRumble/30 day battle records/reply (35) - Revision history2026-04-12T05:04:28ZRevision history for this page on the wikiMediaWiki 1.34.1http://robowiki.net/w/index.php?title=Thread:Talk:RoboRumble/30_day_battle_records/reply_(35)&diff=28510&oldid=prevVoidious: Reply to 30 day battle records2013-02-03T17:00:17Z<p>Reply to <a href="/wiki/Thread:Talk:RoboRumble/30_day_battle_records/reply_(32)" title="Thread:Talk:RoboRumble/30 day battle records/reply (32)">30 day battle records</a></p>
<p><b>New page</b></p><div>If you think about it, it's surprising we haven't yet rewritten the client. We've rewritten everything else plenty of times. =) I think my ultimate client wish list would be:<br />
<br />
* Rewritten protocol for lightning fast uploads (and better/more robust maybe priority battles options).<br />
* Simple, direct control over what battles run. E.g., you could have a rule like "always give voidious.* bots priority if they don't have enough battles."<br />
* Multi-threading support so we don't have to setup/run multiple clients. (Could fork RoboRunner pretty easily I think.)<br />
* At whatever limit of RoboRumble stability, start running battles for [[Distributed Robocode]] instead.<br />
* Recovers from Java OutOfMemory Error's.</div>Voidious