http://robowiki.net/w/index.php?action=history&feed=atom&title=Thread%3ATalk%3ARoboRumble%2FClient_java_version%2Freply_%2829%29Thread:Talk:RoboRumble/Client java version/reply (29) - Revision history2026-04-24T22:57:41ZRevision history for this page on the wikiMediaWiki 1.34.1http://robowiki.net/w/index.php?title=Thread:Talk:RoboRumble/Client_java_version/reply_(29)&diff=51223&oldid=prevSkilgannon: Reply to Client java version2017-09-04T21:36:27Z<p>Reply to <a href="/wiki/Thread:Talk:RoboRumble/Client_java_version/reply_(26)" title="Thread:Talk:RoboRumble/Client java version/reply (26)">Client java version</a></p>
<p><b>New page</b></p><div>Agreed that the SkippedTurnEvent is mostly ignored, and that more could be done on this side. However, there is a reason that we have the CPU calibration, and that is because we want all environments to be similar. It is impossible to get consistent results if on one computer you can do second wave surfing with precise intersection and KNN gun with Gaussian kernel density estimation, and the other you have to fall back to single wave and a simple VCS gun. It would require all rumble battles to be contributed by a single machine, and then we are back to a standard environment.</div>Skilgannon