http://robowiki.net/w/index.php?action=history&feed=atom&title=Thread%3ATalk%3ARoboRumble%2FParticipants%2FGigaRumble%2FNominations_2017-09%2Freply_%2817%29Thread:Talk:RoboRumble/Participants/GigaRumble/Nominations 2017-09/reply (17) - Revision history2026-04-18T04:22:45ZRevision history for this page on the wikiMediaWiki 1.34.1http://robowiki.net/w/index.php?title=Thread:Talk:RoboRumble/Participants/GigaRumble/Nominations_2017-09/reply_(17)&diff=51897&oldid=prevMultiplyByZer0: Reply to Nominations 2017-092017-09-17T19:31:08Z<p>Reply to <a href="/wiki/Thread:Talk:RoboRumble/Participants/GigaRumble/Nominations_2017-09/reply_(16)" title="Thread:Talk:RoboRumble/Participants/GigaRumble/Nominations 2017-09/reply (16)">Nominations 2017-09</a></p>
<p><b>New page</b></p><div>DrussGT, XanderCat, and Roborio bullet-shield Chalk to death, explaining the low APS and Survival. I don't see zero scores anywhere else [https://literumble.appspot.com/BotDetails?game=gigarumble&name=cjm.chalk.Chalk%202.6.Be&order=-Survival in the ranking table], and its rank in GigaRumble (#26) is actually above its rank in RoboRumble (#34).</div>MultiplyByZer0