<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
	<id>http://robowiki.net/w/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=Thread%3ATalk%3ARoboRumble%2FRumble_Client_1.7.3.2_vs_1.7.3.0%2Freply_%283%29</id>
	<title>Thread:Talk:RoboRumble/Rumble Client 1.7.3.2 vs 1.7.3.0/reply (3) - Revision history</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://robowiki.net/w/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=Thread%3ATalk%3ARoboRumble%2FRumble_Client_1.7.3.2_vs_1.7.3.0%2Freply_%283%29"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://robowiki.net/w/index.php?title=Thread:Talk:RoboRumble/Rumble_Client_1.7.3.2_vs_1.7.3.0/reply_(3)&amp;action=history"/>
	<updated>2026-04-12T17:19:54Z</updated>
	<subtitle>Revision history for this page on the wiki</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.34.1</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>http://robowiki.net/w/index.php?title=Thread:Talk:RoboRumble/Rumble_Client_1.7.3.2_vs_1.7.3.0/reply_(3)&amp;diff=25307&amp;oldid=prev</id>
		<title>Voidious: Reply to Rumble Client 1.7.3.2 vs 1.7.3.0</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://robowiki.net/w/index.php?title=Thread:Talk:RoboRumble/Rumble_Client_1.7.3.2_vs_1.7.3.0/reply_(3)&amp;diff=25307&amp;oldid=prev"/>
		<updated>2012-06-26T15:30:45Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Reply to &lt;a href=&quot;/wiki/Thread:Talk:RoboRumble/Rumble_Client_1.7.3.2_vs_1.7.3.0&quot; title=&quot;Thread:Talk:RoboRumble/Rumble Client 1.7.3.2 vs 1.7.3.0&quot;&gt;Rumble Client 1.7.3.2 vs 1.7.3.0&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;New page&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div&gt;It seems very strange, especially considering Wolverine is an ancient bot. There should be no rule or API changes between those versions. If those bots are unstable, I guess I'd vote to remove them, at least temporarily until we can figure out what's up.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For some open source bots like [[SilverSurfer]], people have fixed issues introduced by new versions of Robocode and posted the fix to the rumble, which is a cool solution when possible.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Voidious</name></author>
		
	</entry>
</feed>