http://robowiki.net/w/index.php?action=history&feed=atom&title=Thread%3ATalk%3AXanderCat%2FInitialization_Code_Runtime_Reduction_Effort%2Freply_%2816%29Thread:Talk:XanderCat/Initialization Code Runtime Reduction Effort/reply (16) - Revision history2026-05-01T12:30:55ZRevision history for this page on the wikiMediaWiki 1.34.1http://robowiki.net/w/index.php?title=Thread:Talk:XanderCat/Initialization_Code_Runtime_Reduction_Effort/reply_(16)&diff=28889&oldid=prevSkilgannon: Reply to Initialization Code Runtime Reduction Effort2013-02-17T15:54:41Z<p>Reply to <a href="/wiki/Thread:Talk:XanderCat/Initialization_Code_Runtime_Reduction_Effort/reply_(14)" title="Thread:Talk:XanderCat/Initialization Code Runtime Reduction Effort/reply (14)">Initialization Code Runtime Reduction Effort</a></p>
<p><b>New page</b></p><div>Wow! Great research here. I wonder if you enable [http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/java/javase/gc-tuning-6-140523.html#icms incremental mode] for the concurrent mark sweep GC using <code>-XX:+UseConcMarkSweepGC -XX:+CMSIncrementalMode</code> how that would work. Also, the concurrent collector uses additional cores to do the work, so might not work so well unless there are cores free. Of course, designing a bot so that it is resistant to skipped turns, and uses little CPU and memory, is probably the most important aspect of all.</div>Skilgannon