<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
	<id>http://robowiki.net/w/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=Thread%3AUser_talk%3AAW%2FguideToRobocode%2FSitll_haven%27t_decided_on_a_robot%2Freply</id>
	<title>Thread:User talk:AW/guideToRobocode/Sitll haven't decided on a robot/reply - Revision history</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://robowiki.net/w/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=Thread%3AUser_talk%3AAW%2FguideToRobocode%2FSitll_haven%27t_decided_on_a_robot%2Freply"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://robowiki.net/w/index.php?title=Thread:User_talk:AW/guideToRobocode/Sitll_haven%27t_decided_on_a_robot/reply&amp;action=history"/>
	<updated>2026-04-09T15:14:26Z</updated>
	<subtitle>Revision history for this page on the wiki</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.34.1</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>http://robowiki.net/w/index.php?title=Thread:User_talk:AW/guideToRobocode/Sitll_haven%27t_decided_on_a_robot/reply&amp;diff=29538&amp;oldid=prev</id>
		<title>Voidious: Reply to Sitll haven't decided on a robot</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://robowiki.net/w/index.php?title=Thread:User_talk:AW/guideToRobocode/Sitll_haven%27t_decided_on_a_robot/reply&amp;diff=29538&amp;oldid=prev"/>
		<updated>2013-03-08T17:59:03Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Reply to &lt;a href=&quot;/wiki/Thread:User_talk:AW/guideToRobocode/Sitll_haven%27t_decided_on_a_robot&quot; title=&quot;Thread:User talk:AW/guideToRobocode/Sitll haven&amp;#039;t decided on a robot&quot;&gt;Sitll haven&amp;#039;t decided on a robot&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;New page&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div&gt;My only suggestion so far is that I'd probably leave the 30+ bullet points of Robocode rule details / formulas for later, or in an appendix. It's going to be boring to a newbie, and without any context, they probably won't retain that info anyway. A few sentences of overview about robot/bullet capabilities would be easier to read and draw them in more. You can link to specific rules in the appendix from the main text as you go, if needed.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As for which robot, I think it's really hard to find any objective answer. I doubt anybody's that familiar with multiple top bots' full source code. And even if some folks are, it's a tiny data set to draw conclusions from. I still say that since you're so much more familiar with Gilgalad, it would take a really compelling reason for me to vote for any other bot. I do think Diamond is pretty well designed, and judging from Skotty's incredibly detailed write-ups of XanderCat, it sounds like XanderCat is too. I don't know that DrussGT is a bad choice, either, besides occasional comments from Skilgannon about how messy the code is.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Voidious</name></author>
		
	</entry>
</feed>