http://robowiki.net/w/index.php?action=history&feed=atom&title=Thread%3AUser_talk%3ABeaming%2FSmart_bots_competition%2Freply_%285%29 2026-04-05T17:44:14Z Revision history for this page on the wiki MediaWiki 1.34.1 http://robowiki.net/w/index.php?title=Thread:User_talk:Beaming/Smart_bots_competition/reply_(5)&diff=33878&oldid=prev 2014-10-13T23:23:01Z

<p>Reply to <a href="/wiki/Thread:User_talk:Beaming/Smart_bots_competition/reply_(2)" title="Thread:User talk:Beaming/Smart bots competition/reply (2)">Smart bots competition</a></p> <p><b>New page</b></p><div>I also have a crazy idea of a fine control of the motion, i.e. something more complicated than a simple go to a point which does not change for a several ticks. I want to have a path with smaller/different rotation angles and potentially speed which does not accelerate to max or min state. This produces a lot of possibilities for the paths and takes a lot of time to properly evaluate the danger. Of course it is overkill since such paths are often only 1 pixel apart.<br /> <br /> I think DrussGT has a trick where at every several ticks the bot rotates to left and right, so the bot moves in wave like path. This confuses a linear targeting quite a lot.<br /> <br /> Though, my goal would be to fit in between coming bullets with a fine control of a motion and also meet a wave with bot moving.</div>

Beaming