User talk:Rednaxela/SaphireEdge - Revision history

Nat: /* License */ thank you

2009-09-20T05:47:49Z

License: thank you

Rednaxela: /* License */ reply

2009-09-20T05:38:26Z

License: reply

Nat: /* License */ reply

2009-09-20T04:57:23Z

License: reply

Rednaxela: /* License */ reply

2009-09-20T04:09:15Z

License: reply

Nat: /* License */ new section

2009-09-20T03:28:11Z

License: new section

Nat: reply

2009-04-09T01:07:24Z

Rednaxela: /* Other */ reply

2009-04-08T18:30:07Z

Other: reply

Nat: /* Other */

2009-04-07T18:41:55Z

Other

Rednaxela: /* Other */

2009-04-07T17:25:24Z

Other

Nat: quick and not so quick question

2009-04-07T12:23:01Z

quick and not so quick question

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:47, 20 September 2009
Line 143:		Line 143:

	If you mean the <code>ags.muse.gun.segmentation.Dimension</code> stuff, then sure. :) --[[User:Rednaxela\|Rednaxela]] 05:38, 20 September 2009 (UTC)		If you mean the <code>ags.muse.gun.segmentation.Dimension</code> stuff, then sure. :) --[[User:Rednaxela\|Rednaxela]] 05:38, 20 September 2009 (UTC)
		+
		+	Thank you. » <span style="font-size:0.9em;color:darkgreen;">[[User:Nat\|Nat]] \| [[User_talk:Nat\|Talk]]</span> » 05:47, 20 September 2009 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:38, 20 September 2009
Line 141:		Line 141:

	Thank you. I found that that class saves me a lot of time for dealing with precise GF and VCS buffer =) I'm not going to use your Antialiased-Interpolalated-VCS classes/method, but I may copy a bit of the clustering axes technique you use, as it is far clearer and easier than mine. Is that OK with you? » <span style="font-size:0.9em;color:darkgreen;">[[User:Nat\|Nat]] \| [[User_talk:Nat\|Talk]]</span> » 04:57, 20 September 2009 (UTC)		Thank you. I found that that class saves me a lot of time for dealing with precise GF and VCS buffer =) I'm not going to use your Antialiased-Interpolalated-VCS classes/method, but I may copy a bit of the clustering axes technique you use, as it is far clearer and easier than mine. Is that OK with you? » <span style="font-size:0.9em;color:darkgreen;">[[User:Nat\|Nat]] \| [[User_talk:Nat\|Talk]]</span> » 04:57, 20 September 2009 (UTC)
		+
		+	If you mean the <code>ags.muse.gun.segmentation.Dimension</code> stuff, then sure. :) --[[User:Rednaxela\|Rednaxela]] 05:38, 20 September 2009 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:57, 20 September 2009
Line 139:		Line 139:

	Haha, I'm glad I'm not a crackpot for having a class like that BinUtils one. Feel free to use the things under the ags.util package (i.e. BinUtils) under the same license as my Kd-Tree, but at least for now no derivative works of the main parts of the SaphireEdge gun please as I wish to encourage people to try their own takes on the Antialiased-Interpolalated-VCS technique. That good? :) --[[User:Rednaxela\|Rednaxela]] 04:09, 20 September 2009 (UTC)		Haha, I'm glad I'm not a crackpot for having a class like that BinUtils one. Feel free to use the things under the ags.util package (i.e. BinUtils) under the same license as my Kd-Tree, but at least for now no derivative works of the main parts of the SaphireEdge gun please as I wish to encourage people to try their own takes on the Antialiased-Interpolalated-VCS technique. That good? :) --[[User:Rednaxela\|Rednaxela]] 04:09, 20 September 2009 (UTC)
		+
		+	Thank you. I found that that class saves me a lot of time for dealing with precise GF and VCS buffer =) I'm not going to use your Antialiased-Interpolalated-VCS classes/method, but I may copy a bit of the clustering axes technique you use, as it is far clearer and easier than mine. Is that OK with you? » <span style="font-size:0.9em;color:darkgreen;">[[User:Nat\|Nat]] \| [[User_talk:Nat\|Talk]]</span> » 04:57, 20 September 2009 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:09, 20 September 2009
Line 137:		Line 137:

	Which license does this experiment's robot under? I found that the your BinUtils class is really useful. » <span style="font-size:0.9em;color:darkgreen;">[[User:Nat\|Nat]] \| [[User_talk:Nat\|Talk]]</span> » 03:28, 20 September 2009 (UTC)		Which license does this experiment's robot under? I found that the your BinUtils class is really useful. » <span style="font-size:0.9em;color:darkgreen;">[[User:Nat\|Nat]] \| [[User_talk:Nat\|Talk]]</span> » 03:28, 20 September 2009 (UTC)
		+
		+	Haha, I'm glad I'm not a crackpot for having a class like that BinUtils one. Feel free to use the things under the ags.util package (i.e. BinUtils) under the same license as my Kd-Tree, but at least for now no derivative works of the main parts of the SaphireEdge gun please as I wish to encourage people to try their own takes on the Antialiased-Interpolalated-VCS technique. That good? :) --[[User:Rednaxela\|Rednaxela]] 04:09, 20 September 2009 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:28, 20 September 2009
Line 133:		Line 133:

	Discussion about my research now on its talk page. About utility classes, I don't care since it is not very hard to write. In my machine there's a lot of utility classes I wrote, but have only few operational robot classes :-) » <span style="font-size:0.9em;color:darkgreen;">[[User:Nat\|Nat]] \| [[User_talk:Nat\|Talk]]</span> » 01:07, 9 April 2009 (UTC)		Discussion about my research now on its talk page. About utility classes, I don't care since it is not very hard to write. In my machine there's a lot of utility classes I wrote, but have only few operational robot classes :-) » <span style="font-size:0.9em;color:darkgreen;">[[User:Nat\|Nat]] \| [[User_talk:Nat\|Talk]]</span> » 01:07, 9 April 2009 (UTC)
		+
		+	== License ==
		+
		+	Which license does this experiment's robot under? I found that the your BinUtils class is really useful. » <span style="font-size:0.9em;color:darkgreen;">[[User:Nat\|Nat]] \| [[User_talk:Nat\|Talk]]</span> » 03:28, 20 September 2009 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:07, 9 April 2009
Line 131:		Line 131:

	I'll check the lines of code in a bit, but let me warn you: My implementation relies heavily on quite a number of utility classes I have separate, which if not included make the number lower than a from-scratch thing, but if fully included make the number higher than a from-scratch thing. Oh, I'd call 95% in the random mover challenge impossible for certain. I'd consider the highest possible value to be in the 91% to 92% range, maybe more like 93% if pre-loaded data is allowed. And on your research page, what parts specifically do you mean? (Perhaps that would be a conversation best for [[User talk:Nat/Targeting Research Codename M79\|it's talk page]] too) --[[User:Rednaxela\|Rednaxela]] 18:30, 8 April 2009 (UTC)		I'll check the lines of code in a bit, but let me warn you: My implementation relies heavily on quite a number of utility classes I have separate, which if not included make the number lower than a from-scratch thing, but if fully included make the number higher than a from-scratch thing. Oh, I'd call 95% in the random mover challenge impossible for certain. I'd consider the highest possible value to be in the 91% to 92% range, maybe more like 93% if pre-loaded data is allowed. And on your research page, what parts specifically do you mean? (Perhaps that would be a conversation best for [[User talk:Nat/Targeting Research Codename M79\|it's talk page]] too) --[[User:Rednaxela\|Rednaxela]] 18:30, 8 April 2009 (UTC)
		+
		+	Discussion about my research now on its talk page. About utility classes, I don't care since it is not very hard to write. In my machine there's a lot of utility classes I wrote, but have only few operational robot classes :-) » <span style="font-size:0.9em;color:darkgreen;">[[User:Nat\|Nat]] \| [[User_talk:Nat\|Talk]]</span> » 01:07, 9 April 2009 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:30, 8 April 2009
Line 129:		Line 129:

	Gun system. And if you can tell me both gun system and VCS related, that would be nice. I know what your framework is, RoughDC, isn't it? Soon after I created my one for my research, I'll follow instruction to create VCS24. Just wonder one thing, VCS24 have over 90% against random mover, how my improvement (list at [[User:Nat/Targeting Research Codename M79\|my research page]]) will help. 95% against random movement seem to be impossible to me. » <span style="font-size:0.9em;color:darkgreen;">[[User:Nat\|Nat]] \| [[User_talk:Nat\|Talk]]</span> » 18:41, 7 April 2009 (UTC)		Gun system. And if you can tell me both gun system and VCS related, that would be nice. I know what your framework is, RoughDC, isn't it? Soon after I created my one for my research, I'll follow instruction to create VCS24. Just wonder one thing, VCS24 have over 90% against random mover, how my improvement (list at [[User:Nat/Targeting Research Codename M79\|my research page]]) will help. 95% against random movement seem to be impossible to me. » <span style="font-size:0.9em;color:darkgreen;">[[User:Nat\|Nat]] \| [[User_talk:Nat\|Talk]]</span> » 18:41, 7 April 2009 (UTC)
		+
		+	I'll check the lines of code in a bit, but let me warn you: My implementation relies heavily on quite a number of utility classes I have separate, which if not included make the number lower than a from-scratch thing, but if fully included make the number higher than a from-scratch thing. Oh, I'd call 95% in the random mover challenge impossible for certain. I'd consider the highest possible value to be in the 91% to 92% range, maybe more like 93% if pre-loaded data is allowed. And on your research page, what parts specifically do you mean? (Perhaps that would be a conversation best for [[User talk:Nat/Targeting Research Codename M79\|it's talk page]] too) --[[User:Rednaxela\|Rednaxela]] 18:30, 8 April 2009 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:41, 7 April 2009
Line 127:		Line 127:

	Pretty much yep. And what do you mean by "all code"? Do you mean just related to the anti-aliased/interpolated VCS? Or do you mean in my whole gun system as it stands? Or do you mean the full framework I have all my recent megabot tests in? :P --[[User:Rednaxela\|Rednaxela]] 17:25, 7 April 2009 (UTC)		Pretty much yep. And what do you mean by "all code"? Do you mean just related to the anti-aliased/interpolated VCS? Or do you mean in my whole gun system as it stands? Or do you mean the full framework I have all my recent megabot tests in? :P --[[User:Rednaxela\|Rednaxela]] 17:25, 7 April 2009 (UTC)
		+
		+	Gun system. And if you can tell me both gun system and VCS related, that would be nice. I know what your framework is, RoughDC, isn't it? Soon after I created my one for my research, I'll follow instruction to create VCS24. Just wonder one thing, VCS24 have over 90% against random mover, how my improvement (list at [[User:Nat/Targeting Research Codename M79\|my research page]]) will help. 95% against random movement seem to be impossible to me. » <span style="font-size:0.9em;color:darkgreen;">[[User:Nat\|Nat]] \| [[User_talk:Nat\|Talk]]</span> » 18:41, 7 April 2009 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:25, 7 April 2009
Line 125:		Line 125:

	Well, you really like source-free discussion :-) (which is good) Quick question: floating-point index is, e.g. say index 0 is 0 and index 1 is 100, if data is 78 then floating-point index is 0.78, right? Another not-so-quick question, how long is your code (ALL code, not just recursive code)? (to prepared myself =D) » <span style="font-size:0.9em;color:darkgreen;">[[User:Nat\|Nat]] \| [[User_talk:Nat\|Talk]]</span> » 12:23, 7 April 2009 (UTC)		Well, you really like source-free discussion :-) (which is good) Quick question: floating-point index is, e.g. say index 0 is 0 and index 1 is 100, if data is 78 then floating-point index is 0.78, right? Another not-so-quick question, how long is your code (ALL code, not just recursive code)? (to prepared myself =D) » <span style="font-size:0.9em;color:darkgreen;">[[User:Nat\|Nat]] \| [[User_talk:Nat\|Talk]]</span> » 12:23, 7 April 2009 (UTC)
		+
		+	Pretty much yep. And what do you mean by "all code"? Do you mean just related to the anti-aliased/interpolated VCS? Or do you mean in my whole gun system as it stands? Or do you mean the full framework I have all my recent megabot tests in? :P --[[User:Rednaxela\|Rednaxela]] 17:25, 7 April 2009 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:23, 7 April 2009
Line 123:		Line 123:
	The process for writing is basically along the same lines.		The process for writing is basically along the same lines.
	--[[User:Rednaxela\|Rednaxela]] 08:04, 7 April 2009 (UTC)		--[[User:Rednaxela\|Rednaxela]] 08:04, 7 April 2009 (UTC)
		+
		+	Well, you really like source-free discussion :-) (which is good) Quick question: floating-point index is, e.g. say index 0 is 0 and index 1 is 100, if data is 78 then floating-point index is 0.78, right? Another not-so-quick question, how long is your code (ALL code, not just recursive code)? (to prepared myself =D) » <span style="font-size:0.9em;color:darkgreen;">[[User:Nat\|Nat]] \| [[User_talk:Nat\|Talk]]</span> » 12:23, 7 April 2009 (UTC)