Thread history

From Talk:RoboRunner
Viewing a history listing
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Time User Activity Comment
01:46, 10 December 2012 Skotty (talk | contribs) New thread created  
16:55, 30 December 2012 MN (talk | contribs) New reply created (Reply to Speed vs RoboResearch)
16:55, 30 December 2012 MN (talk | contribs) Comment text edited  
07:52, 4 December 2013 Chase-san (talk | contribs) New reply created (Reply to Speed vs RoboResearch)

Speed vs RoboResearch

I'm curious what kind of speed improvements people have seen, if anyone keeps track. Today, in the midst of developing my own UI for RoboRunner, I decided to do a test run to compare RoboRunner vs RoboResearch. I ran MC2K7 Fast Learning challenge against XanderCat 11.6. All data was cleared from the robots directory in both tests. 2 Threads in both cases. RoboResearch ran in 5:30. RoboRunner ran in 3:50. That's about a 30% speed improvement -- pretty dramatic. With dirty data directories where there is a lot of past data, I bet the speed difference would be an order of magnitude more significant. RoboResearch can get pretty slow starting up battles when you haven't cleared out the data for awhile. Results will vary based on the data directories and what kind of robots are being run, but regardless, I think anyone using RoboRunner will see a noticeable speed boost. Very nice.

Skotty01:46, 10 December 2012

RoboResearch has an annoying problem when bots print something in the console. The clients crash and the threads become stuck in paused mode. You have to recreate the clients manually. So, RoboResearch is a lot more than 30% slower.

MN16:55, 30 December 2012

I actually hopefully just fixed the problem about the threads pausing. I still use RoboResearch since getting RoboJogger/RoboRunner to cooperate is difficult at times.

If possible I wouldn't mind hammering RoboRunner into RoboResearch, since aside from a few bugs it works rather well.

Chase07:52, 4 December 2013