Thread history

From Talk:TassieDevils
Viewing a history listing
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Time User Activity Comment
01:36, 5 June 2012 Voidious (talk | contribs) New thread created  
02:26, 5 June 2012 Rednaxela (talk | contribs) New reply created (Reply to score vs LunarTwins)
12:41, 5 June 2012 Wompi (talk | contribs) New reply created (Reply to score vs LunarTwins)
12:53, 5 June 2012 Wompi (talk | contribs) Comment text edited (i changed the link to the opposite - the old one was broken after the version change)
13:42, 5 June 2012 Rednaxela (talk | contribs) New reply created (Reply to score vs LunarTwins)
02:47, 6 June 2012 Wompi (talk | contribs) New reply created (Reply to score vs LunarTwins)
05:39, 6 June 2012 Rednaxela (talk | contribs) New reply created (Reply to score vs LunarTwins)

score vs LunarTwins

Edited by another user.
Last edit: 12:53, 5 June 2012

Wow, this is for real? [1] I gotta check out this team. =)

Voidious01:36, 5 June 2012

Mmm... I can confirm this is most definitely for real... Congrats Wompi! I may have to look into tweaking LunarTwins some time... :)

Rednaxela02:26, 5 June 2012
 

Thanks mates. Yes for a short time it was real :). And it is good to see that i could encourage you to improve your bots.

@Rednaxela: Could you please change the LunarTwins_1.4 to be 1.6 compatible you compiled it with 1.7 and my mac don't like 1.7 :). And i really want to see the next generation Lunars. I guess you got rid of the droid or improved your wall detection.

take care

Wompi12:41, 5 June 2012

Ah, whoops. Fixed the java version compatibility now. Sorry about that.

Nope... those were not the changes ;)

Rednaxela13:42, 5 June 2012
 

No need for sorry. Well i hope my new version is a little more challenging for you :).

Wompi02:47, 6 June 2012
 

Hah, nice work. I did some poking around and I don't think LunarTwins will be beating that any time soon. It'd take a major overhaul, unlike the little tweak that was 1.4

Rednaxela05:39, 6 June 2012