Difference between revisions of "Talk:PwnBot"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(no, it isn't embarrassing.) |
|||
| (2 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| + | |||
I have 68 bytes to spare on PwnBot for the targeting. I'm sure I have more; I haven't tried to make the code smaller whatsoever, but I just want to know. Would it just be a SPM? [[User:Awesomeness|Awesomeness]] 02:44, 20 January 2010 (UTC) | I have 68 bytes to spare on PwnBot for the targeting. I'm sure I have more; I haven't tried to make the code smaller whatsoever, but I just want to know. Would it just be a SPM? [[User:Awesomeness|Awesomeness]] 02:44, 20 January 2010 (UTC) | ||
: Symbolic Pattern Matcher? Not for 68 bytes. Most versions I've seen use 120ish bytes for that type of gun. --[[User:Miked0801|Miked0801]] 16:05, 20 January 2010 (UTC) | : Symbolic Pattern Matcher? Not for 68 bytes. Most versions I've seen use 120ish bytes for that type of gun. --[[User:Miked0801|Miked0801]] 16:05, 20 January 2010 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | :: Well, I have not tried to compress the code much. I suck at it, but I'm slowly getting better. I'm sure if I post it at the [[Help:Help/Code Shrinking|Code Shrinking Help Request]] page, the size would get chopped in half. But it's kind of embarrassing to post my bots there because I usually overlook really obvious ways to make it smaller... [[User:Awesomeness|Awesomeness]] 17:33, 20 January 2010 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | :: No, it is not. Figure it out by your own take times, but if you post it you will figure out in no time. We normally post the what-is-behind-the-shrink too so you can learn from it. But maybe your code is already squeezed. Don't be embarrassed for learn. --[[User:Nat|<span style="color:#099;">Nat</span>]] [[User talk:Nat|<span style="color:#0a5;">Pavasant</span>]] 10:57, 21 January 2010 (UTC) | ||
Latest revision as of 11:57, 21 January 2010
I have 68 bytes to spare on PwnBot for the targeting. I'm sure I have more; I haven't tried to make the code smaller whatsoever, but I just want to know. Would it just be a SPM? Awesomeness 02:44, 20 January 2010 (UTC)
- Symbolic Pattern Matcher? Not for 68 bytes. Most versions I've seen use 120ish bytes for that type of gun. --Miked0801 16:05, 20 January 2010 (UTC)
- Well, I have not tried to compress the code much. I suck at it, but I'm slowly getting better. I'm sure if I post it at the Code Shrinking Help Request page, the size would get chopped in half. But it's kind of embarrassing to post my bots there because I usually overlook really obvious ways to make it smaller... Awesomeness 17:33, 20 January 2010 (UTC)
