Difference between revisions of "User talk:AaronR"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(wide layouts) |
(Oops.) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Wow, does that page layout actually work in your browser without overlaps? That requires a 1100 px (Safari) or 1180 px (FireFox) wide browser for me, which I wouldn't be using no matter what resolution I'm in. :-P I think 800 px is a normal min width to design for. --[[User:Voidious|Voidious]] 02:38, 12 November 2007 (UTC) | Wow, does that page layout actually work in your browser without overlaps? That requires a 1100 px (Safari) or 1180 px (FireFox) wide browser for me, which I wouldn't be using no matter what resolution I'm in. :-P I think 800 px is a normal min width to design for. --[[User:Voidious|Voidious]] 02:38, 12 November 2007 (UTC) | ||
| + | : My resolution is 1440x900, so I can get my browser down to 4/5 of my screen width without any overlap whatsoever (plus, I always keep my browser window maximized and just use tabs). Still, I suppose it is kind of ridiculous... --[[User:AaronR|AaronR]] 02:43, 12 November 2007 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 03:43, 12 November 2007
Wow, does that page layout actually work in your browser without overlaps? That requires a 1100 px (Safari) or 1180 px (FireFox) wide browser for me, which I wouldn't be using no matter what resolution I'm in. :-P I think 800 px is a normal min width to design for. --Voidious 02:38, 12 November 2007 (UTC)
- My resolution is 1440x900, so I can get my browser down to 4/5 of my screen width without any overlap whatsoever (plus, I always keep my browser window maximized and just use tabs). Still, I suppose it is kind of ridiculous... --AaronR 02:43, 12 November 2007 (UTC)
