Difference between revisions of "Thread:User talk:Chase-san/Approximate ELO/reply (20)"

From Robowiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Reply to Approximate ELO)
 
(Did I say 10, I meant 20.)
Line 1: Line 1:
Hey that's not bad! It places some of the top 10 a bit high, and that bugs me a little, but every other bot fits a bit better.
+
Hey that's not bad! It places some of the top 20 a bit high, and that bugs me a little, but every other bot fits a bit better.
  
 
My biggest worry is it places YersiniaPestis and up in the 2100's and Tomcat is very close to the 2200 (not really a problem), and the top 2 are over halfway to the 2300s (not a problem really, since they are in their own little universe anyway).
 
My biggest worry is it places YersiniaPestis and up in the 2100's and Tomcat is very close to the 2200 (not really a problem), and the top 2 are over halfway to the 2300s (not a problem really, since they are in their own little universe anyway).
  
 
Traditionally the 2100's started around Phoenix (85.78), but Shadow (84.69) up would be perfectly fine.
 
Traditionally the 2100's started around Phoenix (85.78), but Shadow (84.69) up would be perfectly fine.

Revision as of 16:36, 1 November 2012

Hey that's not bad! It places some of the top 20 a bit high, and that bugs me a little, but every other bot fits a bit better.

My biggest worry is it places YersiniaPestis and up in the 2100's and Tomcat is very close to the 2200 (not really a problem), and the top 2 are over halfway to the 2300s (not a problem really, since they are in their own little universe anyway).

Traditionally the 2100's started around Phoenix (85.78), but Shadow (84.69) up would be perfectly fine.