Difference between revisions of "Thread:User talk:Chase-san/Approximate ELO/reply (20)"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Reply to Approximate ELO) |
|||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | Hey that's not bad! It places some of the top | + | Hey that's not bad! It places some of the top 20 a bit high, and that bugs me a little, but every other bot fits a bit better. |
My biggest worry is it places YersiniaPestis and up in the 2100's and Tomcat is very close to the 2200 (not really a problem), and the top 2 are over halfway to the 2300s (not a problem really, since they are in their own little universe anyway). | My biggest worry is it places YersiniaPestis and up in the 2100's and Tomcat is very close to the 2200 (not really a problem), and the top 2 are over halfway to the 2300s (not a problem really, since they are in their own little universe anyway). | ||
Traditionally the 2100's started around Phoenix (85.78), but Shadow (84.69) up would be perfectly fine. | Traditionally the 2100's started around Phoenix (85.78), but Shadow (84.69) up would be perfectly fine. | ||
| + | |||
| + | -290*ln(100/APS - 1) + 1600 | ||
| + | |||
| + | Might be a better compromise. | ||
Latest revision as of 16:41, 1 November 2012
Hey that's not bad! It places some of the top 20 a bit high, and that bugs me a little, but every other bot fits a bit better.
My biggest worry is it places YersiniaPestis and up in the 2100's and Tomcat is very close to the 2200 (not really a problem), and the top 2 are over halfway to the 2300s (not a problem really, since they are in their own little universe anyway).
Traditionally the 2100's started around Phoenix (85.78), but Shadow (84.69) up would be perfectly fine.
-290*ln(100/APS - 1) + 1600
Might be a better compromise.
