Difference between revisions of "Thread:User talk:Chase-san/Approximate ELO/reply (22)"

From Robowiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Reply to Approximate ELO)
 
 
Line 1: Line 1:
 
While there is no simple way to take care that drift in the long run (that I can think of), I think we should correct it as much as we can at the moment. At least to a point where the current historical numbers have some meaning again (2000 club, etc). So at least people can claim their titles.
 
While there is no simple way to take care that drift in the long run (that I can think of), I think we should correct it as much as we can at the moment. At least to a point where the current historical numbers have some meaning again (2000 club, etc). So at least people can claim their titles.
  
I would like to see a way that can be a bit more drift tolerant, but I have no (good) suggestions on how to go about doing that.
+
I would like to see a way to make the approximate elo a bit more drift tolerant, but I have no (good) suggestions on how to go about doing that.

Latest revision as of 14:02, 2 November 2012

While there is no simple way to take care that drift in the long run (that I can think of), I think we should correct it as much as we can at the moment. At least to a point where the current historical numbers have some meaning again (2000 club, etc). So at least people can claim their titles.

I would like to see a way to make the approximate elo a bit more drift tolerant, but I have no (good) suggestions on how to go about doing that.