Difference between revisions of "Thread:Talk:RoboRumble/Robot Count/reply (2)"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Reply to Robot Count) |
(Major edit.) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
I noticed this a while ago. | I noticed this a while ago. | ||
| − | I don't think that it's a very big deal. After all, the minirumble is for all robots that have a codesize of less than 1500 bytes | + | I don't think that it's a very big deal. After all, the minirumble is for all robots that have a codesize of less than 1500 bytes, the microrumble is for all robots with a codesize less than 750 bytes, and the nanorumble is for all robots with a codesize less than 250 bytes. So, nanos and micros fit into the minirumble because, well, they ''are'' minis in the sense that they are all under 1500 bytes. |
| + | |||
| + | To say that minis and micros could could have their own exclusive rumbles would require different definitions of the weight classes. And, if you're going to all that trouble, you might consider more consistent brackets, like 250, 500, 1000, 2000. | ||
Latest revision as of 20:25, 14 April 2013
I noticed this a while ago.
I don't think that it's a very big deal. After all, the minirumble is for all robots that have a codesize of less than 1500 bytes, the microrumble is for all robots with a codesize less than 750 bytes, and the nanorumble is for all robots with a codesize less than 250 bytes. So, nanos and micros fit into the minirumble because, well, they are minis in the sense that they are all under 1500 bytes.
To say that minis and micros could could have their own exclusive rumbles would require different definitions of the weight classes. And, if you're going to all that trouble, you might consider more consistent brackets, like 250, 500, 1000, 2000.
