Difference between revisions of "Thread:User talk:Skilgannon/KDTree/Regarding PrioQueue/reply (7)"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Skilgannon (talk | contribs) m (Reply to Regarding PrioQueue) |
Skilgannon (talk | contribs) m |
||
Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
Strange, it must have to do with cache sizes and RAM speeds. | Strange, it must have to do with cache sizes and RAM speeds. | ||
− | Here is [http://ark.intel.com/products/52224/Intel-Core-i5-2410M-Processor-%283M-Cache-2_30-GHz%29 my CPU]. I have 6GB of | + | Here is [http://ark.intel.com/products/52224/Intel-Core-i5-2410M-Processor-%283M-Cache-2_30-GHz%29 my CPU]. I have 6GB of DDR3-1333, and <code>java -version</code> gives me |
<pre> | <pre> | ||
java version "1.7.0" | java version "1.7.0" |
Latest revision as of 09:16, 18 July 2013
Here's what I get:
BEST RESULT: - #1 Skilgannon's Cache-hit KDTree [0.0285] - #2 Rednaxela's kd-tree (3rd gen) [0.0311] - #3 Rednaxela's kd-tree (2nd gen) [0.0326] - #4 Voidious' Linear search [0.4172]
Strange, it must have to do with cache sizes and RAM speeds.
Here is my CPU. I have 6GB of DDR3-1333, and java -version
gives me
java version "1.7.0" Java(TM) SE Runtime Environment (build 1.7.0-b147) Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM (build 21.0-b17, mixed mode)
I also have an SSD, if that changes anything. Anything stand out to you?