Difference between revisions of "Thread:User talk:Wolfman/RoboRumble/reply (4)"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m (Reply to RoboRumble) |
m (elaborate) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
The consensus on the pre-stored data kind of "allowed, but considered cheesy". We have one such example in the Nanorumble (See [[LittleBlackBook|LBB]]), and it's generally considered to be an amusing novelty rather than a serious competitor because it does this. | The consensus on the pre-stored data kind of "allowed, but considered cheesy". We have one such example in the Nanorumble (See [[LittleBlackBook|LBB]]), and it's generally considered to be an amusing novelty rather than a serious competitor because it does this. | ||
| + | |||
| + | In the upper ranks of the megabot rumble, it would probably be considered bad form unless it's a one-off experiment of "let's see how well this does", which would be considered interesting instead of bad form. | ||
Latest revision as of 15:14, 27 November 2013
The consensus on the pre-stored data kind of "allowed, but considered cheesy". We have one such example in the Nanorumble (See LBB), and it's generally considered to be an amusing novelty rather than a serious competitor because it does this.
In the upper ranks of the megabot rumble, it would probably be considered bad form unless it's a one-off experiment of "let's see how well this does", which would be considered interesting instead of bad form.
