Difference between revisions of "ShieldBot/Version History"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m (fix) |
m (Use RumbleStatsDefault instead of SimpleStats) |
||
(2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
---- | ---- | ||
* {{SimpleVersion|date=2017-08-31|version=0.012e}} | * {{SimpleVersion|date=2017-08-31|version=0.012e}} | ||
− | ** '''{{ | + | ** '''{{RumbleStatsDefault |link=http://literumble.appspot.com/BotDetails?game=roborumble&name=aaa.ShieldBot%200.012e|rumble=RoboRumble|scorelabel=APS|score=54.17|rank=499th|win=652|loss=503|plrank=474th|glicko2=N/A|pwin=56.45|vote=12.68|anpp=55.94|score2label=Survival|score2=64.15}}''' |
** probably the best shielder ever. It ranks '''No.2 in vote''', which is 12.68%. In comparison, DrussGT's vote is 14.54%. EnergyDome's vote used to be 10.17%, but now it decreased to 4.78%. | ** probably the best shielder ever. It ranks '''No.2 in vote''', which is 12.68%. In comparison, DrussGT's vote is 14.54%. EnergyDome's vote used to be 10.17%, but now it decreased to 4.78%. | ||
− | ** note the APS is lower than EnergyDome, because it would fire at SittingDuck like bot at all (where EnergyDome is treating energy drain as bullets and fire at "them") | + | ** note the APS is lower than EnergyDome, because it would NOT fire at SittingDuck like bot at all (where EnergyDome is treating energy drain as bullets and fire at "them", then earn a 100% against those ducks) |
Latest revision as of 13:57, 5 September 2017
- ShieldBot Sub-pages:
- ShieldBot - Version History - Understanding ShieldBot
- 0.012e – 2017-08-31
- RoboRumble ‒ APS: 54.17% (499th), PL: 652-503 (474th), Survival: 64.15%
- probably the best shielder ever. It ranks No.2 in vote, which is 12.68%. In comparison, DrussGT's vote is 14.54%. EnergyDome's vote used to be 10.17%, but now it decreased to 4.78%.
- note the APS is lower than EnergyDome, because it would NOT fire at SittingDuck like bot at all (where EnergyDome is treating energy drain as bullets and fire at "them", then earn a 100% against those ducks)