Difference between revisions of "Thread:Talk:RoboRumble/Participants/GigaRumble/Nominations 2017-09/reply"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m (Reply to Nominations 2017-09) |
m |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
About [[Roborio]]: it will be retired as soon as [[Knight]] surpasses it, and that won't take too long since I used this an opportunity to rewrite parts of [[Roborio]] from scratch (I'll retire it because they have too much in common). Therefore, I think it shouldn't be added. | About [[Roborio]]: it will be retired as soon as [[Knight]] surpasses it, and that won't take too long since I used this an opportunity to rewrite parts of [[Roborio]] from scratch (I'll retire it because they have too much in common). Therefore, I think it shouldn't be added. | ||
| − | The others make sense, | + | The others make sense, GigaRumble seems to be a quite interesting rumble. |
Latest revision as of 14:47, 14 September 2017
Is there a problem specifically about GigaRumble on adding a non-stable version then update it along the way?
About Roborio: it will be retired as soon as Knight surpasses it, and that won't take too long since I used this an opportunity to rewrite parts of Roborio from scratch (I'll retire it because they have too much in common). Therefore, I think it shouldn't be added.
The others make sense, GigaRumble seems to be a quite interesting rumble.
