Difference between revisions of "Thread:Talk:LiteRumble/1.9.3.0/reply"
m (Reply to 1.9.3.0) |
m |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
As far as I know, Robocode 1.9.3.0 hasn't been officially released yet. [http://robocode.sourceforge.net/ The website] and [https://github.com/robo-code/robocode/releases GitHub] still name 1.9.2.6 as the latest version, and [https://sourceforge.net/projects/robocode/files/robocode/ there is no 1.9.3.0 download]. You can only get it by building from the latest git master. What I linked to was a draft of the new changelog. | As far as I know, Robocode 1.9.3.0 hasn't been officially released yet. [http://robocode.sourceforge.net/ The website] and [https://github.com/robo-code/robocode/releases GitHub] still name 1.9.2.6 as the latest version, and [https://sourceforge.net/projects/robocode/files/robocode/ there is no 1.9.3.0 download]. You can only get it by building from the latest git master. What I linked to was a draft of the new changelog. | ||
| − | I don't think any new releases will be made until poor Fnl finishes dealing with [https://sourceforge.net/p/robocode/bugs/ all of the bugs reports] I piled onto him. | + | I don't think any new releases will be made until poor Fnl finishes dealing with [https://sourceforge.net/p/robocode/bugs/ all of the bugs reports] I piled onto him. What I have been doing for the past week is emptying my mental list of annoyances with Robocode onto its bugtracker. |
So currently, it is still in development, and it's a bit too early to do regression testing with this new version. | So currently, it is still in development, and it's a bit too early to do regression testing with this new version. | ||
What does need testing, however, is Robocode on Java 9. We already found [https://sourceforge.net/p/robocode/bugs/390/ CPU constant calculation] and [https://sourceforge.net/p/robocode/bugs/389/ team JARs] to be broken there, and doubtlessly there are more issues. | What does need testing, however, is Robocode on Java 9. We already found [https://sourceforge.net/p/robocode/bugs/390/ CPU constant calculation] and [https://sourceforge.net/p/robocode/bugs/389/ team JARs] to be broken there, and doubtlessly there are more issues. | ||
Latest revision as of 22:06, 8 October 2017
As far as I know, Robocode 1.9.3.0 hasn't been officially released yet. The website and GitHub still name 1.9.2.6 as the latest version, and there is no 1.9.3.0 download. You can only get it by building from the latest git master. What I linked to was a draft of the new changelog.
I don't think any new releases will be made until poor Fnl finishes dealing with all of the bugs reports I piled onto him. What I have been doing for the past week is emptying my mental list of annoyances with Robocode onto its bugtracker.
So currently, it is still in development, and it's a bit too early to do regression testing with this new version.
What does need testing, however, is Robocode on Java 9. We already found CPU constant calculation and team JARs to be broken there, and doubtlessly there are more issues.
