Difference between revisions of "Thread:Talk:LiteRumble/Rankings Stable"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m (fix) |
m |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
I once thought that "Rankings Not Stable" is hardcoded to show that the rankings are never stable so one should always run more battles. | I once thought that "Rankings Not Stable" is hardcoded to show that the rankings are never stable so one should always run more battles. | ||
| − | But today is the first time I | + | But today is the first time I noticed "Rankings Stable", quite surprising. |
So, what's the mechanism behind "Rankings Stable" and "Rankings Not Stable"? Is "Rankings Stable" displayed whenever every bot gets a full pairings? | So, what's the mechanism behind "Rankings Stable" and "Rankings Not Stable"? Is "Rankings Stable" displayed whenever every bot gets a full pairings? | ||
Latest revision as of 06:16, 17 June 2018
It seems that both 1v1 and melee now shows "Rankings Stable" instead of "Rankings Not stable".
I once thought that "Rankings Not Stable" is hardcoded to show that the rankings are never stable so one should always run more battles.
But today is the first time I noticed "Rankings Stable", quite surprising.
So, what's the mechanism behind "Rankings Stable" and "Rankings Not Stable"? Is "Rankings Stable" displayed whenever every bot gets a full pairings?
