Difference between revisions of "Thread:Talk:DrussGT/Understanding DrussGT/Reason behind using Manhattan distance/reply (9)"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m |
m |
||
| (4 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
and if we put two curves together (shifted so that tey intersects on x=0) | and if we put two curves together (shifted so that tey intersects on x=0) | ||
| − | + | http://robowiki.net/w/images/5/5a/C3BD3E15-EEB6-4F63-826F-7C1F5E54A78E.gif | |
| − | + | euclidean looks terrible with large noise in one dimension, and manhattan looks robust. | |
Latest revision as of 03:05, 29 August 2018
my case is noise in another dimension ;)
however if noise is added to the main dimension,
it will be
sqrt((1 + x)^2 + 1)
vs
|1 + x | + 1
and if we put two curves together (shifted so that tey intersects on x=0)
http://robowiki.net/w/images/5/5a/C3BD3E15-EEB6-4F63-826F-7C1F5E54A78E.gif
euclidean looks terrible with large noise in one dimension, and manhattan looks robust.
