Difference between revisions of "Thread:Talk:RoboRumble/Participants/Is there a mistake in Rumble battle staging/reply (7)"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Reply to Is there a mistake in Rumble battle staging) |
m (add link to archive) |
||
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
− | # We need to find out whether they have only 1 pairings 10 years ago. If so, we could add back the missing pairings from backup. | + | # We need to find out whether they have only 1 pairings [http://web.archive.org/web/20140428181547/http://literumble.appspot.com/BotDetails?game=roborumble&name=voidious.micro.Jen%201.11 10 years ago]. If so, we could add back the missing pairings from backup. |
− | |||
# From the [https://github.com/bumfo/literumble/blob/master/HandleQueuedResults.py#L286 code], "Battles" is merely a counter. If it shows 1 pairing, then there must be data loss unless it's 1 initially. | # From the [https://github.com/bumfo/literumble/blob/master/HandleQueuedResults.py#L286 code], "Battles" is merely a counter. If it shows 1 pairing, then there must be data loss unless it's 1 initially. |
Latest revision as of 07:12, 22 February 2023
- We need to find out whether they have only 1 pairings 10 years ago. If so, we could add back the missing pairings from backup.
- From the code, "Battles" is merely a counter. If it shows 1 pairing, then there must be data loss unless it's 1 initially.