Difference between revisions of "Robowiki talk:Copyrights"
(I'm not sure) |
(about license) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Hey guys. I'm wonder which is the license for the content from this site? Is it Public Domain, GFDL, CC or what? » <span style="font-size:0.9em;color:darkgreen;">[[User:Nat|Nat]] | [[User_talk:Nat|Talk]]</span> » 14:21, 11 May 2009 (UTC) | Hey guys. I'm wonder which is the license for the content from this site? Is it Public Domain, GFDL, CC or what? » <span style="font-size:0.9em;color:darkgreen;">[[User:Nat|Nat]] | [[User_talk:Nat|Talk]]</span> » 14:21, 11 May 2009 (UTC) | ||
| − | I actually don't know. I might've thought it was Public Domain, but [ | + | I actually don't know. I might've thought it was Public Domain, but [[wikipedia:Wikipedia:Public domain|this Wikipedia page]] makes me think otherwise. I'm not sure there's an easy answer to that question, actually. (And of course, [[wikipedia:IANAL|IANAL]].) --[[User:Voidious|Voidious]] 15:08, 12 May 2009 (UTC) |
| + | |||
| + | What make you think otherwise? I think [[User:David Alves|he]] hasn't chose license yet when he install MediaWiki, because the only way that there is no license metadata at the bottom of page (in yellow box) is to chose "No license metadata" or "Creative Commons License" in "Copyright/License" section of MediaWiki installer. | ||
| + | |||
| + | I really think it is a time to chose a license for this wiki. If we use Public Domain, we are not allowed to copy content from Wikipedia ([http://www.gnu.org/copyleft/fdl.html GFDL] != [http://creativecommons.org/licenses/publicdomain/ Public Domain]). | ||
| + | |||
| + | (Anyway IANAL too) » <span style="font-size:0.9em;color:darkgreen;">[[User:Nat|Nat]] | [[User_talk:Nat|Talk]]</span> » 15:23, 12 May 2009 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 17:23, 12 May 2009
Hey guys. I'm wonder which is the license for the content from this site? Is it Public Domain, GFDL, CC or what? » Nat | Talk » 14:21, 11 May 2009 (UTC)
I actually don't know. I might've thought it was Public Domain, but this Wikipedia page makes me think otherwise. I'm not sure there's an easy answer to that question, actually. (And of course, IANAL.) --Voidious 15:08, 12 May 2009 (UTC)
What make you think otherwise? I think he hasn't chose license yet when he install MediaWiki, because the only way that there is no license metadata at the bottom of page (in yellow box) is to chose "No license metadata" or "Creative Commons License" in "Copyright/License" section of MediaWiki installer.
I really think it is a time to chose a license for this wiki. If we use Public Domain, we are not allowed to copy content from Wikipedia (GFDL != Public Domain).
